1,541 research outputs found

    X ray imaging microscope for cancer research

    No full text
    The NASA technology employed during the Stanford MSFC LLNL Rocket X Ray Spectroheliograph flight established that doubly reflecting, normal incidence multilayer optics can be designed, fabricated, and used for high resolution x ray imaging of the Sun. Technology developed as part of the MSFC X Ray Microscope program, showed that high quality, high resolution multilayer x ray imaging microscopes are feasible. Using technology developed at Stanford University and at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Troy W. Barbee, Jr. has fabricated multilayer coatings with near theoretical reflectivities and perfect bandpass matching for a new rocket borne solar observatory, the Multi-Spectral Solar Telescope Array (MSSTA). Advanced Flow Polishing has provided multilayer mirror substrates with sub-angstrom (rms) smoothnesss for the astronomical x ray telescopes and x ray microscopes. The combination of these important technological advancements has paved the way for the development of a Water Window Imaging X Ray Microscope for cancer research

    John B. Swauger v. W. C. Lawler : Brief of Appellant

    No full text
    Appealed from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Honorable Clarence E. Baker and Ray Van Cott, Jr., Judges

    John B. Swauger v. W. C. Lawler : Brief of Respondent

    No full text
    Appealed from the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Honorable Clarence R. Baker and Ray Van Cott, Jr., Judges

    The Center for Ray Bradbury Studies: A Case Study in Sustaining a Single Author Archive

    No full text
    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)The Center for Ray Bradbury Studies (cited also as the “Bradbury Center” or the “Center”) is a single author archive, museum, and outreach center housed in the Institute for American Thought, located in the School of Liberal Arts at IUPUI. This dissertation employs a case study methodology to explore the complex issue of single author archive management and sustainability as it applies to the Bradbury Center by extending the research process beyond working with primary sources and published materials. The applied research project unfolded in two phases. The first involved an intensive four-day on-site consultation in which five professional archivists and preservation experts from across the Midwest visited the Bradbury Center and examined its collections and policies. Following their visit, the consultants prepared recommendations concerning artifacts, manuscripts, correspondence, physical layout, access, operational procedures, processing priorities, and environmental/climate control for artifacts. The on-site consultation team also informed objectives, goals, and strategies for addressing the preservation needs of the Center’s vast and varied collections, aiding in systematically moving forward with curatorial initiatives, and planning for general organizational development. The second research phase involved site visits to five peer institutions to tour facilities, interview directors and archivists about best practices, and established a plan for adapting these practices to the Bradbury Center. Findings from both research phases inform the Bradbury Center’s immediate and long-term plans for center staff, fundraising, spatial expansion and renovation, and the Center’s strategy for identifying key constituencies as it endeavors to serve a broad spectrum of public and academic audiences through various outreach and programming initiatives. Upon completion of the case study field research, a formal report was prepared. That report serves as the cornerstone for this applied dissertation. Additional chapters cast a vision for the Bradbury Center and address potential opportunities to serve the Indianapolis region by tapping into tourism markets, conventions, and local cultural festivals and celebrations while also developing into an international research hub as the sole entity that preserves the material legacy of Ray Bradbury. The introductory chapter situates the Bradbury Center within the legacy of the central figure of the Center—Ray Bradbury

    Ray P. Holland to Horace Kephart, December 31, 1928

    No full text
    In a letter to Horace Kephart on December 21, 1928, Ray P. Holland, Editor of “Field & Stream” writes to tell Kephart that his article “Afoot and Awing in the Great Smokies” was chosen as one of the ten best stories of the month by a committee of judges of the Franklin Square Agency.RAY P. HOLLAND EDITOR ELTINGE F. WARNER PUBLISHER 578 Madison Avenue at fifty-seventh street New York City Field & Stream's CONSERVATION COUNCIL D. R. ANTHONY, JR. Congressman; joint Introducer of the Game Refuge Bill. HORACE M.ALBRIGHT Superintendent of Yellowstone National Park. BROOKE ANDERSON Member of the Federal Advisory Board of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. J. B. HARKIN Commissioner of the Canadian National Parks. GEORGE A. LAWYER Former Chief United States Game Warden. WM. B. MERSHON Sportsman — Author — Conservationist. E. W. NELSON Ex-Chief of the U. S. Biological Survey. HARRY S. NEW U. S. Postmaster General; joint Introducer of the Game Refuge Bill in the United States. Senate. T. GILBERT PEARSON President of the National Association of Audubon Societies. THEO. ROOSEVELT First Executive Chairman of the National Conference on Outdoor Recreation. December 31, 1928 Mr. Horace Kephart, Bryson City, N. C. Dear Mr. Kephart: I thought you would be interested in knowing that your story "Afoot and Awing in the Great Smokies", published in the January issue, was chosen by a committee of judges of the Franklin Square Agency, which is owned by Harper Brothers, as one of the ten best stories of the month. With the best of the holiday greetings, I am Sincerely yours, RPHsFTC Edito

    [Photograph 2012.201.B1019.0518]

    No full text
    Photograph used for a story in the Daily Oklahoman newspaper. Caption: "Doing KP duty while wives join the Mothers' March on polio at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday will be Menter G. Baker Jr., center, county March of Dimes chairman, T. Ray Phillips Jr., and hundred of other husbands. Mrs. Phillips, left, is Oklahoma City Mothers March chairman.

    Mobile Press-Register sleeve MP0071853

    No full text
    X-ray Diagnostic Center / Dr. Charles Lenton Jr. / Glenda Harris, for NIE [Newspapers In Education] / (130 Louiselle Street

    Diffuse X-ray scattering from tropomyosin crystals

    No full text
    Motions in proteins are often an important part of their function. Structural information about the protein is hence incomplete without an understanding of the protein dynamics. X-ray crystallography is the technique used in the majority of protein structure determinations; from a crystallographic standpoint as well, the movement of the molecules in the crystal which profoundly affect the X-ray scattering are important. All motions in the crystal affect the Bragg scattering and also give rise to diffuse scattering between and surrounding the Bragg spots. The diffuse X-ray scattering may comprise a large part of the total scattering from the crystal, and it contains information about the correlation of motions that is not available from analysis of the Bragg diffraction peaks.Tropomyosin is a muscle protein that is involved in control of the muscle contraction process. Changes in the structural conformation of the protein are an essential part of this process. Tropomyosin crystals exhibit striking diffuse scattering patterns which are related to its inherent flexibility and motions in the crystal. Diffuse scattering data along all the major directions of the crystal have been measured. A complete three-dimensional diffuse scattering data set has been simulated, and this has been compared to the experimental data in the measured directions. A combination of empirical and analytical methods were used to perform the simulations, and the amplitudes, directions and correlation distances of the motions within the crystal have been calculated.Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9136564.pdf: 3711670 bytes, checksum: 00f1c04f4d101c748340ba8b70364527 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding ([email protected]) on 2011-05-07T14:54:44Z Item is restricted indefinitely.Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:28-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permissionETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permissionU of I Onl

    Publishing Lolita. Comment on the Preface of John Ray, Jr., Ph.D.

    No full text
    This paper discusses the “act” of publishing in the broad sense as a “process” in stages that considers the education and the linguistic skills of the writer, runs the production, the printing and the distribution of the book, makes use of strategies to avoid censorship and judicial prosecution, and monitors the critics and the publics’ reaction to the book; the main point of this paper, however, is the analysis of the acts of publishing and of writing as they are mentioned or hinted at in the story itself or as they are interwoven in the fictional reality. Then, beginning with a comment on the Preface of Lolita, by John Ray, Jr. ph. D., the fictional authors present argumentative strategies for the non banning of the book and point out relevant aspects of the intricate relationship between, on one hand, John Ray and Humbert Humbert, two writers who are immanent in the narrative web, and, on the other hand, the signatory author, Vladimir Nabokov, bringing out, among other issues, the awareness of the boldness of his literary bet against the readership of the “middle-class nosy era” as well as of its confidence in the promising results of Lolita’s publication
    corecore