1,722,057 research outputs found

    Rank-based detection of weak random signals in a multiplicative noise model

    No full text
    Multiplicative noise is known to be useful in modeling some environment, which is difficult to describe by additive noise model. In this paper, nonparametric detection of weak random signals in multiplicative noise is considered. The locally optimum detector based on signs and ranks of observations is derived for good weak-signal detection performance under any noise probability density function. The detector has similarities to the locally optimum detector for random signals in multiplicative noise. It is shown that the nonparametric detector asymptotically has almost the same performance as the locally optimum detector. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.Korea Research Foundation (KRF), Korea, under a grant for Faculty Research Abroad and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canad

    Asymptotic performance of a user detection scheme in Nakagami interference

    No full text
    Detection of the existence of a desired user is considered in this paper. We assume that the signal to noise ratio is high enough to ignore the effects of noise compared with those of the interference by other users. The inter-user interference and user signals are modeled by the Nakagami model. We observation model for this situation is proposed, the locally optimum test statistic is derived under the model, and the asymptotic performance of the test statistic is compared with that of the envelope detector. We show that the locally optimum detector has performance better than the conventional envelope detector. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.Ministry of Information and Communication (MIC) under grant from the University Basic Research Fund

    Locally optimum rank detector test statistics for composite signals in generalized observations: One-sample case

    No full text
    The one-sample locally optimum rank detector test statistics for composite signals in multiplicative and signal-dependent noise are obtained. Since the one-sample locally optimum rank detector makes use of the sign statistics of observations as well as the rank statistics, both 'even' and 'odd' score functions have to he considered. Although the one-sample locally optimum rank detector requires two score functions while the two-sample detector requires only one score function, the one-sample detector requires fewer calculations since it has to rank fewer observations.Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) under Grant R01-2000-0025

    On rank-based non-parametric detection of composite signals in purely additive noise

    No full text
    In this paper, rank-based detection of composite signals in additive noise is considered. Based on signs and ranks of observations, the locally optimum detector is derived for weak-signal detection. This detector has similarities to the locally optimum detector for composite signals in additive noise. The asymptotic performance of this detector is shown to be as good as that of the locally optimum detector, (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B,V.Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) under grant 961-0923-134-

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore