1,720,976 research outputs found
Survival in patients with class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with first line oral bosentan compared with an historical cohort of patients started on intravenous epoprostenol.
No full textBACKGROUND: The oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan improves exercise capacity and delays clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but its use could delay starting intravenous epoprostenol, a life saving treatment. METHODS: Survival in patients with functional class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with bosentan in clinical trials was compared with historical data from similar patients treated with epoprostenol in the clinic. Statistical methods were used to adjust for possible underlying differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline factors for the 139 patients treated with bosentan and the 346 treated with epoprostenol suggested that the epoprostenol cohort had more severe disease-that is, a lower cardiac index (2.01 v 2.39 l/min/m2) and higher pressures and resistance. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan cohort and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol cohort. Cox regression analyses adjusting for differences in baseline factors showed a greater probability of death in the epoprostenol cohort (hazard ratio 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.0) in the model adjusted for haemodynamics). Alternative regression analyses and analyses to adjust for different data collection dates gave consistently similar results. When matched cohorts of 83 patients each were selected, survival estimates were similar. In the bosentan cohort 87% and 75% of patients followed for 1 and 2 years, respectively, remained on monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found to suggest that initial treatment with oral bosentan, followed by or with the addition of other treatment if needed, adversely affected the long term outcome compared with initial intravenous epoprostenol in patients with class III idiopathic PAH
Survival with first-line bosentan in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension.
No full textThe efficacy and safety of combining bosentan, an orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist and epoprostenol, a continuously infused prostaglandin, in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was investigated. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective study, 33 patients with PAH started epoprostenol treatment (2 ng.kg(-1)min(-1) starting dose, up to 14+/-2 ng.kg(-1)min(-1) at week 16) and were randomised for 16 weeks in a 2:1 ratio to bosentan (62.5 mg b.i.d for 4 weeks then 125 mg b.i.d) or placebo. Haemodynamics, exercise capacity and functional class improved in both groups at week 16. In the combination treatment group, there was a trend for a greater (although nonsignificant) improvement in all measured haemodynamic parameters. There were four withdrawals in the bosentan/epoprostenol group (two deaths due to cardiopulmonary failure, one clinical worsening, and one adverse event) and one withdrawal in the placebo/epoprostenol group (adverse event). This study showed a trend but no statistical significance towards haemodynamics or clinical improvement due to the combination of bosentan and epoprostenol therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Several cases of early and late major complications were reported. Additional information is needed to evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of combined bosentan-epoprostenol therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension
ARIES-1: A placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of ambrisentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
No full textAmbrisentan is a high affinity, propanoic acid-class, ETA-selective endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) with once-daily oral doses. Ambrisentan doses of 2.5 and 5 mg once-daily improved 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and delayed clinical worsening in a placebo-controlled PAH study (ARIES-2), with no incidence of serum aminotransferases >3xULN. ARIES-1 evaluated ambrisentan doses of 5 and 10 mg once-daily, compared to placeb
End points and clinical trial design in pulmonary arterial hypertension
No full textNew and emerging therapies might provide benefit in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Their efficacy and safety will be compared with existing combination therapies in randomized clinical trials. Appropriate end points for these trials need to be identified: these will include exercise testing, the composite end point of time to clinical worsening, and hemodynamic markers, including advanced imaging modalities and biomarkers. Quality-of-life questionnaires are useful and important secondary end points; pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific questionnaires are currently being developed. Advantages and disadvantages of various trial designs, including placebo-controlled monotherapy or add-on trials, noninferiority studies, and withdrawal trials are also discusse
Sitaxsentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a 1-year, prospective, open-label observation of outcome and survival.
No full textAmbrisentan therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who discontinued bosentan or sitaxsentan due to liver function test abnormalities.
No full textSome endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are associated with liver function test (LFT) result abnormalities. However, ambrisentan has an incidence of serum aminotransferase levels more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN), similar to that observed in PAH patients who are not receiving ERAs. Because ambrisentan may provide benefits in PAH patients who have discontinued ERA therapy due to LFT abnormalities, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan in this patient population. METHODS: Patients who previously discontinued bosentan and/or sitaxsentan due to LFT abnormalities received ambrisentan, 2.5 mg qd, for 4 weeks followed by 5 mg/d for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence of aminotransferase levels more than three times ULN considered by the investigator to be related to ambrisentan and resulting in drug discontinuation. Secondary end points included aminotransferase levels more than five times ULN requiring drug discontinuation and more than three times ULN requiring dose reduction, as well as changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), Borg dyspnea index, World Health Organization functional class, and Short Form-36 health survey score. Patients continued treatment beyond the 12-week end point with monthly monitoring of LFTs. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients who previously discontinued bosentan (n = 31), sitaxsentan (n = 2), or both (n = 3) were enrolled. At baseline, 69.4% of patients were receiving prostanoid and/or sildenafil therapy. No patient had an aminotransferase level more than three times ULN that required ambrisentan discontinuation. One patient had a transient aminotransferase level more than three times ULN that resolved following a temporary dose reduction. No additional aminotransferase levels more than three times ULN were observed with long-term treatment (median exposure, 102 weeks), despite dose increases to 10 mg qd in more than half of the patients. Significant improvements in 6MWD and other efficacy assessments were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ambrisentan treatment may be an option for patients who have discontinued bosentan and/or sitaxsentan therapy due to LFT result abnormalitie
Oral Treprostinil for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients on Background Endothelin Receptor Antagonist and/or Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Therapy (The FREEDOM-C Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial
No full textBackground: Infused and inhaled treprostinil are effective for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), although their administration routes have limitations. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of bid oral sustained-release treprostinil in the treatment of PAH with a concomitant endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and/or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Methods: A 16-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 350 patients with PAH randomized to placebo or oral treprostinil. All patients were stable on background ERA, PDE-5 inhibitor, or both. Primary end point was Hodges-Lehmann placebo-corrected median difference in change from baseline 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 16. Secondary end points included time to clinical worsening, change in World Health Organization functional class, Borg dyspnea score, and dyspnea fatigue index score. Results: Thirty-nine patients (22%) receiving oral treprostinil and 24 patients (14%) receiving placebo discontinued the study. Placebo-corrected median difference in change from baseline 6MWD at week 16 was 11 m (P 5.07). Improvements in dyspnea fatigue index score (P 5.01) and combined 6MWD and Borg dyspnea score (P 5.01) were observed with oral treprostinil vs placebo treatment. Patients who achieved a week-16 bid oral treprostinil dose of 1.25 to 3.25 mg and 3.5 to 16 mg experienced a greater change in 6MWD (18 m and 34 m, respectively) than patients who achieved a bid dose of < 1 mg or discontinued because of adverse events (4 m). Conclusions: The primary end point of improvement in 6MWD at week 16 did not achieve significance. This study enhanced understanding of oral treprostinil titration and dosing, which has set the stage for additional studie
Addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized trial
No full textOral sildenafil and intravenous epoprostenol have independently been shown to be effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of adding oral sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. DESIGN: A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Multinational study at 41 centers in 11 countries from 3 July 2003 to 27 January 2006. PATIENTS: 267 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic, associated anorexigen use or connective tissue disease, or corrected congenital heart disease) who were receiving long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or sildenafil, 20 mg three times daily, titrated to 40 mg and 80 mg three times daily, as tolerated, at 4-week intervals. Of 265 patients who received treatment, 256 (97%) patients (123 in the placebo group and 133 in the sildenafil group) completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: Change from baseline in exercise capacity measured by 6-minute walk distance (primary end point) and hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and Borg dyspnea score (secondary end points). RESULTS: A placebo-adjusted increase of 28.8 meters (95% CI, 13.9 to 43.8 meters) in the 6-minute walk distance occurred in patients in the sildenafil group; these improvements were most prominent among patients with baseline distances of 325 meters or more. Relative to epoprostenol monotherapy, addition of sildenafil resulted in a greater change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure by -3.8 mm Hg (CI, -5.6 to -2.1 mm Hg); cardiac output by 0.9 L/min (CI, 0.5 to 1.2 L/min); and longer time to clinical worsening, with a smaller proportion of patients experiencing a worsening event in the sildenafil group (0.062) than in the placebo group (0.195) by week 16 (P = 0.002). Health-related quality of life also improved in patients who received combined therapy compared with those who received epoprostenol monotherapy. There was no effect on the Borg dyspnea score. Of the side effects generally associated with sildenafil treatment, the most commonly reported in the placebo and sildenafil groups, respectively, were headache (34% and 57%; difference, 23 percentage points [CI, 12 to 35 percentage points]), dyspepsia (2% and 16%; difference, 13 percentage points [CI, 7 to 20 percentage points]), pain in extremity (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points]), and nausea (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points]). LIMITATIONS: The study excluded patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with other causes. There was an imbalance in missing data between groups, with 8 placebo recipients having no postbaseline walk assessment compared with 1 sildenafil recipient. These patients were excluded from the analysis. CONCLUSION: In some patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, the addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy improves exercise capacity, hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and quality of life, but not Borg dyspnea score. Increased rates of headache and dyspepsia occurred with the addition of sildenafil
Request to "Update" the 2019 Update of Guidelines for Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Response
No full textTherapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Adults Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
No full text- …
