1,721,002 research outputs found
The clinical-molecular interface of somatostatin, dopamine and their receptors in pituitary pathophysiology
No full textPituitary tumor disappearance in a patient with newly diagnosed acromegaly primarily treated with octreotide LAR
No full textBiochemical diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in acromegaly: a two-decade experience.
No full textThe objective of this study is to assess the secretory pattern of GH after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) or day-curve (DC), in relation with IGF-I and to evaluate the influence of therapy on OGTT. A retrospective analysis in 279 OGTTs performed in 93 acromegalic patients in our unit from January 1988 to December 2005, in 77 patients also DC data were retrived. GH concentration was evaluated by 3 different systems (RIA, IRMA and chemiluminescence assays), and IGF-I by two RIAs. About 12% of OGTT samples were discordant with the baseline, while discordance between nadir and 120th minute was much lower (5%), with all discordant values, except one, near the cut-off lines. Correlation between DC and OGTT data was around 0.99 among all values, discordance rate between nadir and minimum DC was much lower than that with mean DC. In almost 80% of cases there was a complete concordance between OGTT and DC results, and in about 30% IGF-I was discordant with GH. Correlation analysis between IGF-I and GH was highest with DC data and lowest with OGTT baseline (T0). Considering different treatments discrepancy rates between GH and IGF-I were comparable. The best GH parameter is the minimum GH DC, although in the clinical practice the evaluation of OGTT GH in association with IGF-I is the most practical approach. In this case, the basal and T120 GH values can replace multiple sampling. Different treatment modalities do not influence the discordance rate between GH and IGF-I
Low-grade inflammation, CoVID-19, and obesity: clinical aspect and molecular insights in childhood and adulthood
No full textThe new 2019 coronavirus 19 disease (CoVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses a serious threat to health systems. As a global health problem, this pandemic poses a huge threat to people and is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. On the other hand, obesity has also reached epidemic proportions and poses another challenge to the healthcare system. There is increasing evidence of a strong association between obesity and CoVID-19 disease, but the mechanisms underlying the link between the two remain unclear and the role of obesity also remains to be elucidated. In particular obesity-related low-grade inflammation has been hypothesized as the Achille's heel that could predispose subjects with obesity to a more severe CoVID-19 compared to subjects with normal weight. Hence, we summarized recent evidence on the role of low-grade inflammation in clinical aspects of CoVID-19 in subjects with obesity in both childhood and adulthood. Further, we provide molecular insights to explain this link
Somatostatin receptor pathophysiology in the neuroendocrine system
No full textThe actions of somatostatin (SRIF) are mediated by specific G protein-coupled receptors, named SRIF receptor (SSTR) subtypes 1, 2, 3 and 5. SRIF binding to SSTR activates a series of second messenger systems, resulting in the inhibition of calcium channels and adenylate cyclase activity, ultimately leading to inhibition of hormone secretion, while stimulation of other second messengers, such as phosphotyrosine phosphatases play a role in the control of cell growth. The SSTR and dopamine receptor families share a 30% sequence homology and appear to be structurally related. The knowledge on the pathophysiology of these two families of G protein-coupled receptors in neuroendocrine tumors has progressively increased due to the new insights in receptor dimerization, internalization and trafficking. Depending on the expression of different SSTRs in tissues, their combinations and interactions affect the functionality of the subtypes expressed and the influence of the microenvironment, the response to ligands and, by consequence, the response to treatment can be very different. © 2013 Expert Reviews Ltd
Twenty years of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: is reclassification worthwhile and feasible?
No full textGastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with heterogeneous clinical behavior and potential long-term survival. In 2006/2007, the European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society introduced an important parameter, grade (based on mitoses and Ki-67 proliferation rate), which became part of the latest 2010-WHO classification. Since this is an important tool in the choice of therapeutic algorithm of patients with NETs, our aim was to audit whether retrospective reclassification is possible and feasible and correlate pathological findings with survival. From the histopathology archive, 338 GEP-NETs (1994-2014) were identified, of which 250 were diagnosed pre-2010 and 80 of these have needed, up till now, classification (morphology and grade-mitotic count/Ki-67). Morphology was well differentiated (WD) in 74 cases while only 6 cases were poorly differentiated (PD). Grade was reclassified: G1-45 cases (56 %); G2-28 cases (35 %); G3-7 cases (9 %). Overall survival (OS) in WD NETs was strikingly better compared to PD neoplasms. Differences in OS between grade were statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and, in particular, grade identified a subgroup of patients with WD lesions but with less favorable clinical behavior (OS at 5 years: G1-89 %; G2-48 %; G3-0 %; G1 vs G2 p = 0.03). Feasibility analysis quantified time for reclassification to be between 45 and 64 min/case. Our series confirms the importance of grade in prognostic stratification and underlines that reclassification is feasible, and may prove worthwhile in patient management, especially in view of the potential long survival of patients with NETs and risk of use of inappropriate therapies
- …
