186,236 research outputs found

    Ginungagapus bocus Bell 1947, comb. nov.

    No full text
    Ginungagapus bocus (Bell, 1947), comb. nov. (Figs 4, 12, 19 and 24) Eutocus bocus Bell, 1947. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1330: 6, fig. 7 (male gen.); holotype male, Itatiaya Mountains, Campo Bello [=Itatiaia], Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, J. F. Zikán leg.; AMNH. Lucida bocus; Evans, 1955. Cat. Amer. Hesp. 4, p. 118, pl. 60 (male gen.).—Bridges, 1983. Lep. Hesp. 1, p. 17; 2, p. 19.—Bridges, 1988. Cat. Hesp. 1, p. 27; 2, p. 31.—Bridges, 1994. Cat. Fam.-Group, Gen.-Group and Sp.-Group Nam. Hesperioidea 8, p. 32; 9, p. 35; 10, p. 4.—Mielke, 2004. Hesperioidea, p. 71, in Lamas (ed.). Checklist: Part 4 A, Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea, in Heppner (ed.). Atlas Neotrop. Lep. 5 A.— Mielke, 2005. Cat. Amer. Hesperioidea 4, p. 1048. (no genus) bocus; Beattie, 1976. Rhop. Direct., p. 97. Type. Holotype in AMNH Systematic history. Described as belonging to Eutocus, thereafter transferred by Evans (1955) to Lucida together with the description of this genus. All other authors mention the species in taxonomical comments, geographical distribution studies and catalogues. Diagnosis. Very similar to G. tangerinii sp. nov. with respect to: the central and discal areas light brown or bluish between well marked bands; inner line of harpe with spines; posterior end of aedeagus with asymmetrical lobes, both rounded; and fultura inferior dorsally thin and straight. However, G. bocus comb. nov. can be distinguished by its greater forewing size, more produced harpe, ovoid elongated lateral expansion of lamella antevaginalis; posterior margin of sterigma with lateral projections separated by a U shaped concave margin; and presence of sclerotized grooves within the ductus bursae. Geographical distribution and phenology. Coastal mountains of southeastern Brazil. BRAZIL: Espírito Santo, Santa Teresa (II, III). Minas Gerais, Campo Belo (XI). Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia (I–IV, VII, XII), Petrópolis (I–IV, VIII, IX, XII), Rio de Janeiro (I, II, VII, VIII), Teresópolis (I–IV, XI, XII). Altitude. 200–1600m Examined material. AMNH (1), BMNH (1), DZUP (36), MGCL (17), IOC (7), MNRJ (10), USNM (11).Published as part of Carneiro, Eduardo, Mielke, Olaf H. H. & Casagrande, M. M., 2015, The Neotropical genus Ginungagapus gen. nov. (Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae, Moncini): phylogenetic position and taxonomic review, pp. 196-220 in Zootaxa 3931 (2) on page 204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3931.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/23341

    Endoscopic ultrasonography in large gastric folds

    No full text
    Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis is a clinical challenge because the etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. The gastric wall is considered thickened at endosonography when it is more than 3.6 mm in width. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall. When abnormalities involve the second layer only, benign conditions can be considered and standard endoscopic biopsies are often diagnostic. When abnormalities involve layers two and three, different diseases can be suspected, including Helicobacter pylori infection and lymphoma; in this case large-particle biopsy should be considered. When abnormalities involve layer four, malignancy should be strongly suspected even if standard or large-particle biopsies are negative. Endosonography, always in combination with fine-needle or guillotine-needle biopsy, should be able to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient. © Georg Thieme Verlag

    Endosonography in gastric lymphoma and large gastric folds

    No full text
    To establish a correct preoperative differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and cancer is essential but can be difficult as endoscopic biopsies can sometimes provide a low diagnostic yield. By EUS, infiltrative carcinoma tends to show a vertical growth in the gastric wall, while lymphoma tends to show mainly a horizontal extension. EUS provides an accurate staging of gastric lymphoma, showing the exact level of infiltration and the presence of perigastric lymph nodes, thus the physician can obtain an accurate prognosis for each patient and select the best form of treatment accordingly. The response to chemoradiotherapy can also be investigated very accurately by EUS. Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis represents a clinical challenge because etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall, thus a characteristic echo-pattern helps for the differential diagnosis. Endosonography, used always in combination with biopsy, allows to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient (medical or surgical). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd

    Which stent stenosis of the esophagus which [Quale stent in quale stenosi dell'esofago].

    No full text
    Self expandable esophageal prosthesis today represent an effective palliative treatment in esophageal cancer and in cases of stenosis or fistula into the trachea or in the mediastinum, with a limited number of complications. Covered metal ones are preferable, while the plastic stents present a more difficult position and higher incidence of migration. Results in benign stenosis are less successful: their use is recommended only in selected cases. Further long-term prospective data are awaited before biodegradable stents can be recommended for the management of benign esophageal lesions

    Programmed cell desth 4 (PDCD4) expression during multistep Barett's carcinogenesis.

    No full text
    Abstract AIM: To test the contribution of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) tumour suppressor gene in Barrett's carcinogenesis. METHODS: PDCD4 immunohistochemical expression was assessed in 88 biopsy samples obtained from histologically proven long-segment Barrett's mucosa (BM; 25 non-intestinal columnar metaplasia, 25 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 16 low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-IEN), 12 high-grade IEN (HG-IEN) and 10 Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAc)). As controls, 25 additional samples of native oesophageal mucosa (N) were obtained from patients with dyspepsia. To further support the data, the expression levels of miR-21, an important PDCD4 expression regulator, in 14 N, 5 HG-IEN and 11 BAc samples were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results PDCD4 immunostaining decreased progressively and significantly with the progression of the phenotypic changes occurring during Barrett's carcinogenesis (p<0.001). Normal basal squamous epithelial layers featured strong PDCD4 nuclear immunoreaction (mostly coexisting with weak-moderate cytoplasmic staining). Non-intestinal columnar metaplasia and intestinal metaplasia preserved a strong nuclear immunostaining; conversely, a significant decrease in PDCD4 nuclear expression was seen in dysplastic (LG-IEN and HG-IEN) and neoplastic lesions. Weak-moderate cytoplasmic immunostaining was evident in cases of LG-IEN, while HG-IEN and BAc samples showed weak cytoplasmic or no protein expression. As expected, miR-21 expression was significantly upregulated in HG-IEN and BAc samples, consistently with PDCD4 dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a significant role for PDCD4 downregulation in the progression of BM to BAc, and confirm miR-21 as a negative regulator of PDCD4 in vivo. Further efforts are needed to validate PDCD4 as a potential prognostic marker in patients with Barrett's oesophagus

    Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) expression during multistep Barrett's carcinogenesis (vol 63, pg 692, 2010)

    No full text
    AIM: To test the contribution of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) tumour suppressor gene in Barrett's carcinogenesis. METHODS: PDCD4 immunohistochemical expression was assessed in 88 biopsy samples obtained from histologically proven long-segment Barrett's mucosa (BM; 25 non-intestinal columnar metaplasia, 25 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 16 low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-IEN), 12 high-grade IEN (HG-IEN) and 10 Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAc)). As controls, 25 additional samples of native oesophageal mucosa (N) were obtained from patients with dyspepsia. To further support the data, the expression levels of miR-21, an important PDCD4 expression regulator, in 14 N, 5 HG-IEN and 11 BAc samples were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results PDCD4 immunostaining decreased progressively and significantly with the progression of the phenotypic changes occurring during Barrett's carcinogenesis (p<0.001). Normal basal squamous epithelial layers featured strong PDCD4 nuclear immunoreaction (mostly coexisting with weak-moderate cytoplasmic staining). Non-intestinal columnar metaplasia and intestinal metaplasia preserved a strong nuclear immunostaining; conversely, a significant decrease in PDCD4 nuclear expression was seen in dysplastic (LG-IEN and HG-IEN) and neoplastic lesions. Weak-moderate cytoplasmic immunostaining was evident in cases of LG-IEN, while HG-IEN and BAc samples showed weak cytoplasmic or no protein expression. As expected, miR-21 expression was significantly upregulated in HG-IEN and BAc samples, consistently with PDCD4 dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a significant role for PDCD4 downregulation in the progression of BM to BAc, and confirm miR-21 as a negative regulator of PDCD4 in vivo. Further efforts are needed to validate PDCD4 as a potential prognostic marker in patients with Barrett's oesophagus

    Endoscopic treatment of pseudosarcomatous squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: case report and personal experience

    No full text
    Abstract: Spindle cell (or pseudosarcomatous) squamous carcinoma (PSC) is a rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus, potentially capable of causing lymph node and distant metastases. Indications for surgery are the same as for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. The aims of this paper were to report a case of endoscopically treated PSC and to review our experience of surgically-treated patients with PSC in order to identify patients potentially suitable for endoscopic treatment. In our series of 4460 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus observed between 1980 and 2003, 28 (0.6%) had the histological features of PSC. One had a PSC histologically confirmed (8cm-long polyp with a 3cm-large base) and endoscopically treated for high surgical risk. The patient had a close follow-up with endoscopic biopsies and ultrasonography with no local recurrence at 3 years. The overall survival rate was 22% for PSC and 17% for SCC (P = n.s.); after 5 years, the survival rates were 22% and 13%, respectively (P = n.s.). In our opinion the limited tendency to parietal infiltration and the good chance of disclosure in an early stage with endoscopic ultrasonography, justify non-surgical solutions in patients with a high surgical risk, possibly associated with adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy since lymph node involvement is reported in 50% of cases. The limited number of patients with PSC involved in the present series prevent any significant statistical comparisons between the different groups, but the survival rates were roughly the same in the nonsurgical curative therapy as in the curative resection group, while the chances of survival were significantly lower in patients given palliative surgery and or non-curative treatments (P < 0.05)

    Cancer of the esophagus - Endoscopic ultrasound: Selection for cure

    No full text
    Several treatment options are available to treat esophageal cancer. Ideally, treatment should be individualized, based on the projected treatment outcome for that individual. Accurate staging of the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis offers the most rational attempt at stratifying patients into categories that can be used to affect treatment choices. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most accurate nonoperative technique for determining the depth of tumour infiltration and thus is accurate in predicting which patients will be able to undergo complete resection. EUS is also being used for tumour staging in order to guide treatment decisions in patients with esophageal cancer
    corecore