1,721,032 research outputs found
Thrombosis centres and AVKs monitoring in COVID-19 pandemic
No full textVitamin K-Antagonists (VKAs) are the treatment of choice in patients with indications other than atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Moreover, some patients still assume VKAs refusing to change their therapy when direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are properly indicated. The COVID-19 pandemic has completely changed our lives, nullifying inter-personal relationships to avoid contagion, making difficult the VKAs monitoring. We describe the re-organization of our thrombosis centre (TC) as an example on how to face the emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first phase, to avoid overcrowding at the TC, we planned to increase the interval time between INRs checks and to encourage blood sampling at home, especially for elderly patients. Moreover, precise scheduled blood sampling was also organized while telephone and email counselling were guaranteed by two doctors of the TC. In the second phase, to reduce the number of patients who daily attended our TC a switch from VKAs to DOACs was carried out, if no contraindications were identified. In the third phase, to protect patients, healthcare staff and hospital from COVID-19 widespread, telemedicine was strengthened. We tried to extend self-testing at home by means of portable coagulometers to as more patients as possible. To avoid patients staying or coming back to the TC an ad hoc web platform for sending the therapeutic dose adjustment and the next scheduled appointment was developed. The TC re-organization allowed us to monitor anticoagulated patients respecting personal isolation and security measures to avoid possible COVID-19 contagion
Portable coagulometer for vitamin K-antagonist monitoring: the patients’ point of view
Full text linkPurpose: The aim of this study was to know the patients’ point of view on the monitoring of vitamin K-antagonist (VKA) therapy by means of a point of care testing (POCT), ie, using a portable coagulometer by self-testing at home. At first, patients had prothrombin time (PT) international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring at a thrombosis center; afterward, they were shifted to self-testing at home. An interview was done to evaluate the patients’ point of view on the two monitoring periods.
Patients and methods: A total of 92 oral anticoagulated patients were enrolled. The questionnaire contained nine questions that elicited a maximum of five closer answers that were arranged in increasing levels of satisfaction: very little, little, enough, much and completely. Percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR) and adverse events were compared during the two periods of conventional monitoring and self-testing.
Results: The period of conventional monitoring was shorter than that of self-testing (p,0.0001), and the median TTR was satisfactory but lower than that of self-testing (p,0.0001). A total of 85% of the patients were satisfied with self-testing at home. In all, 83% and 73% (p=0.06) of patients felt comfortable about side effects while measuring the PT INR at both home and the thrombosis center, respectively. During the self-testing period, quality of life was improved in 87% of the patients. The cost of test strips was medium–high for 89% of the patients, and 75% of them stated that it was worth improving their quality of life. A switch from VKA to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) was proposed to 24% of the patients, but 68% of them declined because they felt more comfortable monitoring their oral anticoagulant therapy by POCT.
Conclusion: VKA monitoring using POCT at home may play a role in improving the patients’ quality of life and may be considered as an alternative to the use of DOAC at least in certain settings of patients
Clinical history and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulants
No full textBackground: Common risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) are advanced age and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulants drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Methods: In this prospective real-world observational study, oral anticoagulated patients were recruited and followed between June 2013 and December 2019. The primary end-point was to evaluate a possible relationship between bleeding events and patients' clinical history of gastrointestinal disease prior to the start of the therapy. The secondary end-points were time of GIB appearance and the percentage of idiopathic or provoked events, i.e., bleeding due to a gastrointestinal disease. In case of GIB event all the patients were studied by means of endoscopic procedures. Cox regression was used to calculate the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of GIB for each considered clinical variable. Results: 734 patients on both VKAs or DOACs were studied. Overall, 46 hemorrhagic events were recorded: 6 were major bleeding (0.42/100 patient-years) while 43 were clinically relevant non major bleeding (2.8/100 patient-years). The Cox regression analysis did not show any relationships among GIB and the variables considered. Conclusion: The patients' clinical history is neither a predictor for GIB bleeding nor a guide to the choice of the oral anticoagulant to be administered. Routinely applying bleeding risk screening, such as occult blood in the stool, should be added to the periodic laboratory checks for early recognition of patients at higher risk of GIB
The management of oral anticoagulant therapy: the patient's point of view
No full textThe aims of this study were to investigate on the general adhesion of the patients to oral anticoagulant therapy, and particularly on the quality of life of our patients, the doctor-patient relationship and the Centre-patient relationship. For this purpose we administered a questionnaire containing 17 main questions each with a maximum of 4 secondary questions. The questionnaire was administered to two groups of 127 and 137 oral anticoagulated patients (127 males and 137 females, mean age 55 +/- 19 years), followed at two Anticoagulation Clinics, in two Italian cities, Cagliari (Sardinia) and Padua (North East Italy). The cities differed in the number of patients monitored and the management modalities of anticoagulation. The results show that oral anticoagulant therapy does not limit the life-style of the patients. Only 11% of the patients complain of limitations to their daily life. Fifty-two percent believe their health has improved, and 87% are not afraid of negative consequences. The doctor-patient relationship is considered very important by 96% of patients. Seventy-eight percent refer to the Anticoagulation Clinic also for other health problems, 93% consider it important to be assessed by the doctor at the Anticoagulation Clinic, while 83% believe the doctor should always hand out the results personally. We conclude that in general oral anticoagulant therapy is accepted by the majority of patients, in spite of the need for periodic monitoring. The doctor-patient relationship should be taken into account, even in the case of a monitored, computer-assisted method of dose-adjustment
Warfarin or acenocoumarol: What is to be chosen in patients treated with oral anticoagulants?
No full textManagement of Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants Who Need Urgent Surgery for Hip Fracture. . doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678718. Epub 2019 Feb 11. PubMed PMID: 30743280.
No full text
Comparison of prothrombin time INR and clot waveform analysis performed with 129-mmol/L and 105-mmol/L citrate tubes
No full text- …
