3,909 research outputs found
La Rivista di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Scienze affini e la nascita delle scienze umane (1899-1903)
Phénoménologies et théories du langage autour de Merleau-Ponty
Dans la réflexion du xxe siècle, les phénoménologies husserliennes et les structuralismes inspirés par l’oeuvre de Saussure ont partagé plusieurs points de convergence, tant au niveau théorique qu’historique. Cependant, l’image commune que l’on peut
trouver dans les manuels tend à considérer les chemins tracés par ces deux traditions culturelles comme parallèles, voire alternatifs. En effet, il existe une énorme littérature tant sur le « mouvement phénoménologique » que sur le structuralisme linguistique, alors qu’il n’y a que peu d’ouvrages (Broekman 1974 ; Holenstein 1976, 2022 ; Flack 2011, 2013, 2018 ; Aurora 2014, 2016, 2017a, 2017b, 2018, 2019 ; Stawarska
2015, 2020 ; De Palo 2016, 2018, 2020 ; Aurora & Flack 2018) qui visent explicitement à combiner les deux perspectives, en tenant compte du réseau complexe dans lequel elles sont placées et en montrant les multiples figures et idées qu’elles partagent.
En outre, les phénoménologues qui se sont penchés sur le langage sont souvent
en marge du mouvement phénoménologique, au point d’être considérés comme
des auteurs « mineurs » ou « secondaires », c’est le cas, par exemple, de Hendrik
Pos (1898-1955), Gustav Špet (1879-1937) et Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973), qui occupent
tous une position de premier plan dans ce numéro thématique. Celui-ci vise
à étudier certaines des nombreuses perspectives théoriques offertes par un dialogue entre l’approche phénoménologique et les théories linguistiques, un dialogue qui a été redécouvert aujourd’hui, par exemple, dans le domaine des sciences cognitives.
Dans les contributions que nous présentons, la figure de Merleau-Ponty (1908-
1961) revient avec insistance, assumant ainsi un rôle important de jonction entre la phénoménologie et la théorie du langage
Structural phenomenology: A reading of the early Husserl
The aim of this paper is to show that Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations should be regarded as one of the fundamental sources of structuralism. Husserl's version of structuralism is, however, quite original in many respects. Indeed, what Husserl advocates in his works can be defined, following and expanding a line of research inaugurated by scholars like Elmar Holenstein and Giovanni Piana (see Holenstein, E. 1975. Roman Jakobsons phänomenologischer Strukturalismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, Holenstein, E. 1976. Linguistik, Semiotik, Hermeneutik: Plädoyers für eine strukturale Phänomenologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, Holenstein, E. In publication. Phenomenological Phenomenology of Language: Scattered Papers. Geneva: sdvig, Piana, G. 2013a. L'idea di uno strutturalismo fenomenologico. In G. Piana (ed.), Strutturalismo fenomenologico e psicologia della forma, 5-17. http://www.lulu.com/shop/giovanni-piana/strutturalismo-fenomenologico-e-psicologia-della-forma/paperback/product-21332317.html (accessed 20 February 2018), Piana, G. 2013b. Momento figurale e qualità ghestaltica. In G. Piana (ed.), Strutturalismo fenomenologico e psicologia della forma, 101-119. http://www.lulu.com/shop/giovanni-piana/strutturalismo-fenomenologico-e-psicologia-della-forma/paperback/product-21332317.html accessed 20 February 2018), in terms of phenomenological structuralism or of structural phenomenology
A Forgotten Source in the History of Linguistics: Husserl’s Logical Investigations
In appearance, Husserl’s writings seem not to have had any influence on linguistic research, nor does what the German philosopher wrote about language seem to be worth a place in the history of linguistics. The purpose of the paper is exactly to contrast this view, by reassessing both the position and the role of Husserl’s early masterpiece — the Logical Investigations — within the history of linguistics. To this end, I will focus mainly on the third (On the theory of wholes and parts) and fourth (The distinction between independent and non-independent meanings) Investigations, paying special attention to Husserl’s mereology and to the idea of a general pure grammar. The paper tries to situate the third and fourth Logical Investigation within the general context of late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century linguistics and furthermore attempts to show the historical and theoretical importance of the Logical Investigations for the birth and the development of one of the most important linguistic “schools” of the twentieth century, namely structural linguistics
Territory and Subjectivity: The Philosophical Nomadism of Deleuze And Canetti
The paper’s purpose consists in pointing out the importance of the notion of “territory”, in its different accepted meanings, for the development of a theory and a practice of subjectivity both in deleuzean and canettian thought. Even though they start from very different perspectives and epistemic levels, they indeed produce similar philosophical effects, which strengthen their “common” view and the model of subjectivity they try to shape. More precisely, the paper focuses on the deleuzean triad of territorialisation, deterritorialisation, reterritorialisation, with regard to the role it plays in the forming of the subject and in connection with the fundamental deleuzean notion of difference; it furthermore concentrates on the characterization of the notion of territory in Canetti’s work, also in the light of the mentioned deleuzean categories and with reference to the crucial canettian concept of transformation. Finally, the paper analyses both the political consequences of the “nomadic subjectivity” Deleuze and Canetti deal with and the critical and problematic aspects it involves
Teoria del linguaggio e grammatica pura: sulla presenza di Husserl ne i fondamenti della teoria del linguaggio di Hjelmslev
- …
