1,720,964 research outputs found

    Distribution of heat shock proteins in kidneys of rats after immunosuppressive treatment with Cyclosporine A

    No full text
    Cyclosporine A (CsA), a fungal undecapeptide, is the most common immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation and auto-immune diseases. However, it has severe side effects mainly on renal structures and functions. Therefore, nephrotoxicity is the major limiting side effect. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones, that are induced or expressed at high levels in mammalian cells due to a variety of adverse effects. HSPs have beneficial roles in protein processing and protection against cell injury. In the present study, we examined immunohistochemically levels of expression and localization patterns of various HSPs in rat kidneys after administration of a therapeutic CsA dose during 30 days. After CsA treatment, both constitutive HSP 25 and alpha B-crystallin immunoreactivity became stronger in glomeruli, proximal tubules and collecting ducts. Nuclear translocation of these proteins was detected in renal tubules. HSP 47 was detected in the interstitial space between tubules, vascular smooth muscle and medullary rays. Finally, HSP 72 was induced in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells of proximal and distal tubules, and in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells of Henle limbs and collecting ducts. These data demonstrate that CsA clearly induces increased immunoreactivity of HSPs in defined structures of rat kidneys. These findings suggest that these proteins are functionally involved in the defence against renal cellular damage caused by prolonged drug treatment in rat

    Small heat shock proteins expression in rat kidneys treated with cyclosporine A alone and combined with melatonin

    No full text
    Small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) are cytoskeletal chaperones constitutively expressed in the normal kidney but enhanced with beneficial roles during adverse stimuli. Cyclosporine A is an immunosuppressive drug with major adverse side effect such as severe nephrotoxicity. Among possible mechanisms of cyclosporine A-induced renal damage, oxidative stress and cytoskeletal damage have been suggested. Melatonin has been successfully used as antioxidant against many renal diseases. This in vivo study was performed to shed light on the protective effect of melatonin against cyclosporine A-induced renal alterations. We treated rats with cyclosporine A alone, or combined with melatonin, and with melatonin alone (as controls) for 40 days and analysed the renal abundance and distribution of two sHSPs, HSP25 and alpha B-crystallin. These data were correlated with the histopathological effects of the treatments. Cyclosporine A induced insoluble isoforms that moved to soluble fractions after melatonin coadministration as in controls. After cyclosporine A treatment, an intense signal for sHSPs was found within the glomeruli, nucleus and cytoplasm of cortical tubules, collecting ducts and vascular wall. After melatonin supply, the staining was faint, limited to the cytoplasm of cortical tubules, similar to controls. Both fibrosis and tubular alterations significantly decreased after melatonin coadministration. In conclusion, HSP25 and alpha B-crystallin are overexpressed in the rat kidney treated with cyclosporine A but are similar to controls after combined melatonin. This could be a consequence of the cytoprotective effect of melatonin in this nephrotoxic model so that a beneficial sHSPs response is unnecessary

    Cyclosporine A-induced toxicity in two renal cell culture models (LLC-PK1 and MDCK)

    No full text
    Renal damage caused by therapeutic treatment with cyclosporine A has been well documented. Clinical experiences have shown that cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity is determined by interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy. However, the exact mechanism by which this drug causes nephrotoxicity has not yet been clarified. This study used an in vitro model in an attempt to identify the cellular mechanisms underlying kidney cyclosporine A damage. We used two cell lines with the characteristics of proximal and distal tubule cells (pig kidney proximal tubular epithelial cell line [LLC-PK1] and Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line [MDCK]. The cell lines were treated with cyclosporine A for 24 h. After the treatment, the cells were stained with Trypan Blue to estimate cell viability and processed by histochemical reactions to evaluate their cellular metabolism. Four enzymes (acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase) were considered. The cell viability assay showed that the LLC-PK1 cell line was more sensitive to cyclosporine A than MDCK. Remarkably, the LLC-PK1 cells disappeared with cyclosporine A treatment. As for the hydrolytic enzymes, only acid phosphatases showed an increased positivity in the treated LLC-PK1 cells. Similarly, lactate dehydrogenase showed a different activity histochemically. No statistically significant alterations were observed in the succinate dehydrogenase reaction. The cyclosporine A-treated MDCK cell lines did not show any difference in either their hydrolytic or succinate dehydrogenase enzyme positivity with respect to the control line. In contrast, there was a significant increase in lactate dehydrogenase activity. This study allowed the possible mechanism of cyclosporine A-induced damage in renal tubular cells to be evaluated. The enzymatic changes happened rapidly (during the 24 h of treatment), suggesting that this alteration was one of the steps by which cyclosporine A induced toxicity. Moreover, since acid phosphatase is a marker of protein catabolism, the variation in the activity of this enzyme, in the LLC-PK1 line only, showed that cyclosporine can induce alterations leading to cellular toxicity. The modifications in lactate dehydrogenase activity, in both lines, suggested that this drug caused cell stress, inducing the production of lactic acid from glucose in the presence of oxygen. In conclusion, cyclosporine A treatment may force LLC-PK1 and MDCK cells to use anaerobic glycolysis preferentially. Further, these enzyme alterations may represent an epiphenomenon or a consequence of cyclosporine A toxicity
    corecore