35 research outputs found
Supplemental Material, Figure_S3 - Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage
No full textSupplemental Material, Figure_S3 for Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage by Michael D. Williams, Mugdha V. Joglekar, Sarang N. Satoor, Wilson Wong, Effie Keramidaris, Amanda Rixon, Philip O’Connell, Wayne J. Hawthorne, Geraldine M. Mitchell, and Anandwardhan A. Hardikar in Cell Transplantation</p
Supplemental Material, FigureS2_Hardikar - Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage
No full textSupplemental Material, FigureS2_Hardikar for Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage by Michael D. Williams, Mugdha V. Joglekar, Sarang N. Satoor, Wilson Wong, Effie Keramidaris, Amanda Rixon, Philip O’Connell, Wayne J. Hawthorne, Geraldine M. Mitchell, and Anandwardhan A. Hardikar in Cell Transplantation</p
Supplementary_Table_1_new - Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage
No full textSupplementary_Table_1_new for Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage by Michael D. Williams, Mugdha V. Joglekar, Sarang N. Satoor, Wilson Wong, Effie Keramidaris, Amanda Rixon, Philip O’Connell, Wayne J. Hawthorne, Geraldine M. Mitchell, and Anandwardhan A. Hardikar in Cell Transplantation</p
Supplemental Material, FigureS1_Hardikar - Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage
No full textSupplemental Material, FigureS1_Hardikar for Epigenetic and Transcriptome Profiling Identifies a Population of Visceral Adipose-Derived Progenitor Cells with the Potential to Differentiate into an Endocrine Pancreatic Lineage by Michael D. Williams, Mugdha V. Joglekar, Sarang N. Satoor, Wilson Wong, Effie Keramidaris, Amanda Rixon, Philip O’Connell, Wayne J. Hawthorne, Geraldine M. Mitchell, and Anandwardhan A. Hardikar in Cell Transplantation</p
sj-docx-1-tej-10.1177_20417314221140979 – Supplemental material for Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-tej-10.1177_20417314221140979 for Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold by Anne M Kong, Shiang Y Lim, Jason A Palmer, Amanda Rixon, Yi-Wen Gerrand, Kiryu K Yap, Wayne A Morrison and Geraldine M Mitchell in Journal of Tissue Engineering</p
Questions of intermediality: An analysis of radio listings and radio highlights in British newspapers 1920-1960
No full textRadio listings and radio highlights published by newspapers, have attracted limited scholarly interest. In many ways they appear as a form of information, reporting to the reader what the newspaper has been told will be broadcast that day. However, as I will argue in this article, radio listings and programme highlights provide an important insight into the intermedial relationship which developed over time between radio and the print media. Indeed, the different forms they take are linked to the way newspapers and those that work there actively shape their coverage for their readerships. Listings are also important in how newspapers represent the geographic dimensions of radio, showing not only where the stations are broadcasting from but also where they are located on the airwaves. Again, these spatial representations change overtime depending on the needs and circumstances of the newspapers and broadcasters and developments happenings in the wider political, cultural and social context. In this work I will present a discursive historical analysis of the listings and programme highlights found in British newspapers between 1920 and 1960 and how these forms came to represent radio in different ways for the readers. I will also, from this analysis, identify and develop concepts, such as the diachronic, synchronic, spatial and cultural intermediary, as important ways of understanding how the listings and programme highlights work to define and culturally position radio.© 2019, The Author(s). This is an author produced version of a paper published in JOURNAL FOR MEDIA HISTORY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it
Radio and popular journalism in Britain::Early radio critics and radio criticism
No full textThis article explores the way British radio critics began to write about radio in the national press during the 1920s and the early 1930s. I will argue that the way radio came to be covered at this time was a result of the way critics were situated in relation to the needs of and interactions between broadcasters, the press and the existing dominant cultural hierarchy of the time. In response to such tensions many critics began to adapt existing forms of coverage associated with theatre, film and book reviewing to this new aural medium, approaches already known to the editors, the public and themselves. Because of this, most critics came to focus on radio programmes as the text to critique and write about, using a form of impressionism. Others, however, began to create a more contextual approach, writing about radio more as a mass medium, created by broadcasting organizations such as the BBC. As this coverage began to appear in the national newspapers it came to play an important role in the way radio became accepted as part of popular culture.© 2015 Intellect Ltd. This is an author produced version of a paper uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.13.1-2.23_1. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it
The interaction of broadcasters, critics and audiences in shaping the cultural meaning and status of television programmes: the public discourse around the second series of Broadchurch
No full textThe meaning and cultural standing of a television programme is not predetermined or set. Indeed, it changes over time from before the broadcast of the programme, to when it is shown, and after. Over this period, and beyond, different parties will struggle, negotiate and seek consensus over a programme’s status and reception. In this article I will develop a concept of media engagement in relation to such a process. To help delineate this concept I will focus on how broadcasters, critics and the public in the UK interacted over ITV’s second series of Broadchurch (2013-). I will explore how the producers created a publicity image of the programme to position it in popular and critical debates. As I do this I will identify some of the main strategies being followed by media organisations and the related textual and discursive devices utilised in their publicity output to achieve these aims. I will then seek to identify and explore how critics and audiences responded to the broadcaster’s publicity image. However, as I argue, while, with the use of social media, the importance of the public might have increased in such debates, the broadcaster and critic still have a role in framing such discussions and, at least for the critic, in providing a final summation of the public mediated discussion once a programme has finished its run. © 2017, Ingenta. The attached document (embargoed until 01/10/2018) is an author produced version of a paper, uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it
Contextualising Quality US Television Programmes for the UK:The Guardian’s Media and Television Blogs and the Role of Critics
No full text© 2019, Oxford University Press. The attached document (embargoed until 24/01/2021) is an author produced version of a chapter published in TRANSATLANTIC TELEVISION DRAMA: INDUSTRIES, PROGRAMS AND FANS uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available for purchase at the publisher's website. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it
Contextualising Quality US Television Programmes for the UK:The Guardian’s Media and Television Blogs and the Role of Critics
No full text© 2019, Oxford University Press. The attached document (embargoed until 24/01/2021) is an author produced version of a chapter published in TRANSATLANTIC TELEVISION DRAMA: INDUSTRIES, PROGRAMS AND FANS uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available for purchase at the publisher's website. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it
