48 research outputs found
How Durable Is Functional Cure (Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss) in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Treated With Current Antivirals?
Natural surface-film studies in shallow coastal waters of the Baltic and Mediterranean seas.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Environmental Acoustics Laboratory, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 57, 80–952 Gdansk, Poland
Treatment of hepatitis B : is there still a role for interferon?
The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is based on monotherapy with pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN) or with one of the three most potent nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUCs) with the best resistance profiles, i.e. entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Long-term NUCs treatment can achieve virological suppression in almost all patients. However, this requires lifelong therapy, is costly and the rate of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance is low. A one-year course of Peg-IFN has the advantage of providing immune-mediated control of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the possibility of achieving a sustained off-treatment response in nearly 30% of the patients and ultimately, HBsAg loss in approximately 30%-50% of the latter patients during long-term off treatment follow-up. However, the major limitations to the extensive use of this treatment are the need for parenteral therapy and clinical and laboratory monitoring, the side-effects profile and contraindications in certain patients and the limited effectiveness in a large proportion of patients. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of Peg-IFN can be significantly increased by careful patient selection based upon baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV DNA levels, viral genotype, host genetic variants and especially by applying early on-treatment stopping rules based upon HBsAg kinetics. Recently, because of the different mechanisms of action of Peg-IFN and NUCs, the strategy of “adding-on” or “switching to” Peg-IFN in patients being treated with NUCs to accelerate the decline in HBsAg and enhance HBsAg seroclearance rates, has provided interesting results
Cobalt monolayer islands on Ag (111) for ORR catalysis
The design of a catalyst for one of the most important electrocatalytic reactions, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), was done following the most recent guidelines of theoretical studies on this topic. Aim of this work was to achieve a synergic effect of two different metals acting on different steps of the ORR. The catalytic activity of Ag, already known and characterized, was enhanced by the presence of a monolayer of cobalt subdivided into nanosized islands. To obtain such a controlled nanostructure, a novel method utilizing self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) as templates was employed. In a recent study, we were able to perform a confined electrodeposition of cobalt onto Ag(111) in a template formed by selectively desorbing a short-chain thiol (3-mercaptopropionic acid, MPA) from binary SAMs using 1-dodecanthiols (DDT). [32] This method allows for an excellent control of the morphology of the deposit by varying the molar ratio of the two thiols. Because cobalt does not deposit on silver at an underpotential, the alternative approach of surface limited redox replacement (SLRR) was used. This method, recently developed by Adžić et al.,13 consists of the use of a monolayer of a third metal, which can be deposited at an underpotential, as a template for the spontaneous deposition of a more noble metal. Herein, we choose zinc as template for the deposition of cobalt. Ag(111) crystals were covered by monolayer islands consisting of cobalt, with the surface atomic ratios ranging from 12 to 39 % for cobalt. The catalytic activity of such samples towards ORR was evaluated and the best improvement in activity was found to be that of the sample with a cobalt percentage of approximately 30 % with respect to the bare silver, which is in good agreement with theoretical hypotheses
Tenofovir alafenamide as a rescue therapy in a patient with HBV-cirrhosis with a history of Fanconi syndrome and multidrug resistance
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a recommended first-line therapy for both naà ̄ve and experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), although reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypophosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia and Fanconi syndrome have been reported in some patients. Entecavir (ETV) could be considered as a rescue therapy for TDF-treated patients developing renal dysfunction, though patients with prior history of treatment with lamivudine (LAM) can develop ETV resistance strains, which can lead to potentially severe hepatitis flares. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a new prodrug of tenofovir, has recently been developed to improve the renal and bone safety profile compared to TDF, while maintaining the same virologic efficacy. The recently published 48-week phase III TAF registration studies confirmed the superior safety profile. Here we describe a case of a 75-year-old woman with HBV mono-infection and compensated cirrhosis who developed ETV resistant strains and grade 3 chronic kidney disease after many years of LAM and adefovir (ADV) treatment and a TDF-induced Fanconi syndrome. The administration of 25. mg/day of TAF, granted as part of a compassionate use program, rapidly suppressed viral replication to undetectable levels without worsening renal function or side effects
Lamivudine prophylaxis prevents hepatitis B virus reactivation in anti-HBc positive patients under rituximab for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Backgound: A significant proportion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positive patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing rituximab-based chemotherapy (R-CT) may suffer hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. Aims: We wanted to assess efficacy and safety of lamivudine (LMV) prophylaxis to prevent this complication. Methods: Eighty-five consecutive HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive NHL patients (71 years, 100% serum HBV DNA undetectable, 74% anti-HBs positive) received LMV coadministered with R-CT and for 18 months after the end of R-CT. Serum ALT, HBsAg, anti-HBs and HBV DNA were assessed every 4 months during and after end of LMV. Results: During 39 (2–108) months of study period, including 21 months of LMV and 27 additional months after LMV discontinuation, one patient (2%) had HBV reactivation, 31 months after stopping LMV and during administration of new immunosuppressive regimens, without LMV prophylaxis, owing to incomplete oncological response. A 50% decline of anti-HBs titers occurred in 22/63 (35%) patients, including 12 who became anti-HBs seronegative. Five (6%) patients had ALT increase during R-CT but none required R-CT discontinuation. Seventeen (20%) patients died, all for tumour progression. Conclusion: LMV prophylaxis is safe and effective in preventing HBV reactivation in HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive NHL patients receiving R-CT
