1,721,007 research outputs found
Analysis of the Tricuspid Annulus from Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Datasets Provides Insight into Normal Tricuspid Valve Dynamics
In patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation, tricuspid annulus size by three-dimensional echocardiography is related to right heart chamber volumes
Determinants of normal tricuspid annulus area in healthy volunteers: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study
Right atrial volume is a major determinant of tricuspid annulus area in functional tricuspid regurgitation: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study
The aim of this study is to explore the relationships of tricuspid annulus area (TAA) with right atrial maximal volume (RAVmax) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) in healthy subjects and patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) of different aetiologies and severities
Morphologic Analysis of the Normal Right Ventricle Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography-Derived Curvature Indices
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) remodeling involves changes in size, wall thickness, function, and shape. Previous studies have suggested that regional curvature indices (rCI) may be useful for RV shape analysis. The aim of this study was to establish normal three-dimensional echocardiographic values of rCI in a large group of healthy subjects to facilitate future three-dimensional echocardiographic study of adverse RV remodeling.
METHODS: RV endocardial surfaces were reconstructed at end-diastole and end-systole in 245 healthy subjects (mean age, 42 ± 12 years) and analyzed using custom software to calculate mean curvature in six regions: RV inflow tract (RVIT) and RV outflow tract, apex, and body (both divided into free wall and septal regions). Associations with age and gender were studied.
RESULTS: The apical free wall was convex, while the septum (apex and body) was more concave than the body free wall. Septal curvature did not change significantly from end-diastole to end-systole. The RV outflow tract and RVIT became flatter from end-diastole to end-systole. In keeping with the "bellows-like" action of RV contraction, the body free wall became flatter, while the apex free wall changed to a more convex surface. There were no intergender differences in rCI. In older subjects (≥55 years of age), the RV free wall and RV outflow tract were flatter, and from end-diastole to end-systole, the RVIT became less flattened and the apex less pointed. These changes suggest that the right ventricle is stiffer in older subjects, with less dynamic contraction of the RVIT and less bellows-like movement.
CONCLUSIONS: This study established normal three-dimensional echocardiographic values for RV rCI, which are needed to further study RV diastolic dysfunction and remodeling with disease
Why do we need dedicated tools to quantitate the tricuspid annulus by 3D transthoracic echocardiography?
First Clinical Experience With 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Transillumination Rendering
Comparison Between Four-Chamber and Right Ventricular–Focused Views for the Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Size and Function
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) function plays a pivotal prognostic role in multiple cardiac diseases. Echocardiography guidelines recommend that RV quantification be performed in the RV-focused view, which is theoretically more reproducible than the four-chamber (4Ch) view. However, differences between views in RV size and function measurements have never been systematically studied. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare (1) RV size and function parameters obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views and (2) test-retest variability between these two views.
METHODS: Fifty patients (26 men; mean age, 63 ± 18 years) undergoing clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent three repeated acquisitions of the 4Ch and RV-focused views by two sonographers. The first operator performed two acquisitions at the beginning and the end of the clinical transthoracic echocardiographic study, and the second operator performed the third acquisition afterward. RV size and function measurements were obtained from the two views and compared using paired t-test analysis and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra- and interoperator test-retest and intra- and interreader variability for both views were assessed using intraclass correlations and coefficients of variation.
RESULTS: All RV size parameters were significantly larger when measured in the RV-focused view compared with the 4Ch view. Also, all RV function parameters, including RV free wall and global longitudinal strain, were larger in magnitude when measured in the RV-focused view. Measurements variability was consistently better for the RV-focused view.
CONCLUSIONS: RV size and function measurements obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views are not interchangeable. RV size and function parameters measured from the RV-focused view are more reproducible than from 4Ch acquisitions. Therefore, only the RV-focused view should be used for quantitative assessment of the right ventricle
- …
