1,721,236 research outputs found

    Georges Labica et Jean Robelin (Dirs.), Politique et religion, Paris, L'Harmattan, 1994

    No full text
    Achcar Gilbert. Georges Labica et Jean Robelin (Dirs.), Politique et religion, Paris, L'Harmattan, 1994. In: L'Homme et la société, N. 114, 1994. État démocratique ou état confessionnel ? Autour du conflit israël-palestine. p. 147

    La mondialisation de la «manifest destiny» des États-Unis

    No full text
    Achcar Gilbert. La mondialisation de la «manifest destiny» des États-Unis. In: Recherches Internationales, n°66, 4-2001. Le monde, un an après le 11 septembre. pp. 49-53

    Ghassan Salamé (Dir.), Démocraties sans démocrates. Politiques d 'ouverture dans le monde arabe et islamique, Paris, Fayard, 1994

    No full text
    Achcar Gilbert. Ghassan Salamé (Dir.), Démocraties sans démocrates. Politiques d 'ouverture dans le monde arabe et islamique, Paris, Fayard, 1994. In: L'Homme et la société, N. 114, 1994. État démocratique ou état confessionnel ? Autour du conflit israël-palestine. pp. 142-143

    Ghassan Salamé (Dir.), Démocraties sans démocrates. Politiques d 'ouverture dans le monde arabe et islamique, Paris, Fayard, 1994

    No full text
    Achcar Gilbert. Ghassan Salamé (Dir.), Démocraties sans démocrates. Politiques d 'ouverture dans le monde arabe et islamique, Paris, Fayard, 1994. In: L'Homme et la société, N. 114, 1994. État démocratique ou état confessionnel ? Autour du conflit israël-palestine. pp. 142-143

    US Foreign Policy in the News: How the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal Misrepresented the Syrian Conflict

    Full text link
    This thesis analyzes the coverage of the Syrian conflict in the New York Times (NYT), the Washington Post (WP), and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) from March 2011 to April 2018. It focuses on how the three newspapers framed the US government's foreign policies on Syria in six events during the Syrian uprising and civil war. After more than ten years of a multifaceted conflict, which displaced millions of people and caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, Syria is immersed in a deep crisis. Because the Syrian conflict was highly divisive, it is often depicted as a “war of narratives” in which several players sought to enforce their agendas. In the United States, the conflict prompted an intense debate that revolved mainly around the appropriate degree of US involvement in the civil war and how the country should behave in the face of growing Russian and Iranian influence in the Middle East. The three newspapers framed this discussion in different ways. Whereas the NYT adopted a pro-Obama tone, the WP and the WSJ framed President Obama's policy negatively. With respect to the Trump administration, the alignments changed, with the NYT and the WP criticizing the former US president and the WSJ adopting an advisory tone regarding his Syria approach. The three newspapers covered the debates occurring within the US political establishment above all others, which suggests that mainstream newspapers are excessively indexed to elite narratives. This fact also indicates that Western media organizations underrepresent local voices when covering international conflicts. By analyzing the relationship between media, foreign policy, and international conflicts, this research sheds light on crucial aspects of the crisis currently pervading US journalism
    corecore