3 research outputs found
Utilization of Mualaf Zakat Based on Innovation of Social Flour as Bread Bread in Kubalahin Village, Buru District
Lolongguba is the second largest sago producing sub-district in Buru Regency after Teluk Kayeli Sub-district, which has a sago area with a production of 16 tons of sago flour per month. Lolongguba District, which is the center for processing and producing sago, is Kubalahin Village, the majority of whose population are Muslim converts who have converted to Islam since 2009 and earn their living as gardeners and sago farmers. The sago flour processing entrepreneurial group is an empowerment group formed by community groups and legalized by the Kubalahin Village government. The partner\u27s problem is the lack of knowledge about innovations in processing sago flour into a consumer product with various flavors and not having adequate equipment and equipment to support the implementation of activities, as well as processing techniques, entrepreneurship methods and marketing systems that can increase economic value.
The aim of community service activities is to introduce the community to innovation skills in entrepreneurship which are oriented towards development, empowerment and improving the economy, through the use of Mualaf Zakat towards this to achieve output targets with the implementation target of empowering business groups, developing business and entrepreneurship skills besides that. to increase economic value through income from sales of processed Sago Flour products. From this Penakuk Roti product innovation, attractive labels will be made on the product packaging and promotions will be carried out by placing banner advertisements in front of partners\u27 houses and also business groups
Comprehension To Village
It has become very clear, where almost all “village” ontologies emphasize more on the existence of an area / region, as well as the recognition of values inherent in activities, and tend to be made different, especially administratively. We certainly do not deny that administratively the distinction between Village and non-village is needed to facilitate the identification and resolution of problems. But in fact, we find that many villages are more interpreted as something that is not the same as other regions in terms of socio-cultural economic justice and even public policy. So the administrative differentiation then decreases to the distinction between the attitudes of anyone trying to understand the village
Pemahaman Untuk Desa
Menjadi teramat jelas, di mana hampir semua ontologi “desa” menekankan lebih kepada keberadaan satu kawasan/wilayah, serta pengakuan akan nilai-nilai yang melekat pada aktivitas, dan cenderung dibuat berbeda khususnya secara administratif. Kita tentu tidak menolak bahwa secara administrasi kepemerintahan pembedaan antara Desa dengan bukan desa diperlukan untuk mempermudah identifikasi dan penyelesaian masalah. Namun pada faktanya, kita banyak menemukan bahwa desa lebih diartikan sebagai sesuatu yang tidak sama dengan wilayah lain dalam masalah keadilan sosial-budaya ekonomi dan bahkan kebijakan publik. Sehingga pembedaan adimistratif kemudian menurun kepada pembedaan penyikapan-penyikapan siapapun yang mencoba memahami desa
