1,720,990 research outputs found
Screening US and CT for blunt abdominal trauma: A retrospective study.
No full textScreening US and CT for blunt abdominal trauma: A retrospective study
* Giuseppetti Gian MarcoCorresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author,
* Salera Diego,
* Argalia Giulio,
* Salvolini Luca
* Institute of Radiology, Polytechnic University of Marche Medical School, Umberto I Hospital, Ancona, Italy
* Received 20 October 2004. Revised 31 January 2005. Accepted 1 February 2005. Available online 5 March 2005.
* http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.001, How to Cite or Link Using DOI
*
Cited by in Scopus (14)
*
Permissions & Reprints
Abstract
Objective:
To assess the accuracy of screening US and CT in patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the trauma centre of our General Hospital.
Materials and method:
The abdominal US reports of 864 primary trauma patients (139 with major and 725 with minor injuries) and 162 CT reports of a subgroup of the same subjects (64 with major and 98 with minor injuries) were reviewed and compared to the best available reference standard. The accuracy of screening US was assessed by evaluating its overall ability to distinguish negative from positive cases by showing at least one of the lesions documented by the reference standard and its specific ability to depict all lesions; CT reports were evaluated only for the method's performance in depicting all lesions.
Results:
Screening US exhibited a satisfactory overall ability to distinguish negative from positive patients (91.5% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity in major trauma patients versus 73.3% sensitivity and 98.1% specificity in the minor trauma group) and a satisfactory specific ability to depict all injuries in major trauma patients. In minor trauma cases sensitivity was satisfactory for free fluid but unsatisfactory for organ injuries. Of the 21/864 false negative reports (5 in patients with major and 16 in cases with minor traumas), only one affected patient management, a major trauma case, by delaying an emergency laparotomy. The performance of CT in detecting each single lesion was predictably excellent in both patient groups.
Conclusion:
Its satisfactory accuracy for major trauma suggests that US could be employed not only to screen cases for emergency laparotomy but also as an alternative to CT. However, since major traumatic injuries generally carry an imperative indication for CT, especially as regards neurological, thoracic and skeletal evaluation, US should be employed to perform a prompt preliminary examination using a simplified technique in the emergency room simultaneously with resuscitation.
Keywords
* Emergency screening US;
* Blunt abdominal trauma;
* Emergency radiolog
Hemodynamic effects of a prostacyclin analog (Prostavasin) in systemic scleroderma patients
No full textSalivary gland ultrasonography in the evaluation of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Comparison with minor salivary gland biopsy
No full textThese results conclusively indicate that quantitative assessment of salivary gland ultrasonography is a very useful method fdr evaluating salivary gland involvement in SS and can replace other diagnostic techniques, such as sialography or salivary scintigraphy
New PET Radiotracers for the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Full text linkNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of tumours derived from cells of neuroendocrine origin and can potentially arise everywhere in the human body. The diagnostic assessment of NEN can be performed using a variety of PET radiopharmaceuticals. Well-differentiated NEN (NET) present a high expression of SSTR (somatostatin receptors) and can therefore be studied with 68Ga-DOTA-peptides ([68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE). Current guidelines recommend the use of SSTR imaging to assess disease extension at staging/restaging, follow-up, assessment of response to therapy and selection of patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT). [18F]F-FDG is used for the assessment of high-grade tumours (high-grade G2, G3 and NEC) and in every case, there is one or more mismatched lesions between diagnostic CT (positive) and SSTR-PET/CT (negative). [18F]F-DOPA is currently used for the assessment of medullary thyroid carcinoma, neuroblastoma, primary pheochromocytoma and abdominal paraganglioma. In recent years, however, several new tracers were designed exploiting the many potential targets of the neuroendocrine cell and were employed in clinical trials for both imaging and therapy. Currently, the real-life clinical impact of these tracers is still mostly not known; however, the favourable biodistribution (e.g. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI, SSTR antagonists) and the possibility to use new theranostic pairs may provide novel diagnostic as well as therapeutic options (e.g. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, [64Cu]Cu-SARTATE, [68Ga]Ga-CXCR4) for NEN patients
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in delayed splenic vascular injury and active extravasation diagnosis
No full textINTRODUCTION:
We describe the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of delayed splenic vascular injury (DSVI) and active extravasation (DAE) during spleen injury follow-up. CEUS might be used instead of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) during spleen injury follow-up in order to reduce radiation exposure.
OBJECTIVE:
Assess diagnostic comparability between CEUS and CECT in the evaluation of DSVI and DAE during spleen injury follow-up.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
A total of 139 trauma patients (101 males, 38 females; mean age 48.6 years) with CECT diagnosed spleen injury were prospectively evaluated. They performed CEUS and CECT follow-up. All CEUS studies were performed using the same ultrasound scan, convex probe, mechanical index and ultrasound contrast agent dose. Twelve patients performed digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during follow-up, and the diagnostic performance comparability between CEUS and DSA was evaluated.
RESULTS:
CEUS showed 17 delayed spleen injury complications, and in 122 patients no complication was suspected. CECT diagnosed 16 delayed spleen injury complications in these 17 patients and showed a small DSVI in another patient. A total of 122 follow-up CT scans were negative. CEUS and CECT diagnostic comparability was 98.6%. Compared to DSA, CEUS showed a sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 91.7%.
CONCLUSIONS:
CEUS can be used during spleen injury follow-up instead of CECT. Positive CEUS examinations could perform CECT and, when necessary, DSA in order to confirm and treat spleen injury complications
Ultrasonography and colour doppler sonography of salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome.
No full textOf the colour Doppler sonographic (CDS) parameters only PSV was influenced by the degree of chronic inflammation, as shown at the MSG biopsy, suggesting that PSV may reflect the vascular changes occurring in the salivary glands during the course of an autoimmune disease such as pSS
Usefulness of ultrasonography and color Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of major salivary gland diseases
No full textUltrasonographic contrast-enhanced study of sicca syndrome
No full textTo assess the ability of US contrast-enhanced time–intensity curves to depict the changes connected with sicca syndrome, a fairly common condition that is often associated with autoimmune disorders such as Sjogren's syndrome or other diseases. Diagnostic criteria are complex and controversial and although no single test can be considered the gold standard, salivary gland scintigraphy and biopsy are reliable diagnostic methods. Materials and methods: Sixty consecutive patients with sicca syndrome, 40 of whom had primary (n = 23) or secondary (n = 17) Sjogren's syndrome and 20 had non-Sjogren's sicca syndrome, selected according to European Community Study Group diagnostic criteria for Sjogren's syndrome and subjected to contrast-enhanced US imaging of the parotids using a second-generation contrast agent with analysis of time–intensity curves at rest and during salivary stimulation, Tc99m salivary gland scintigraphy and labial gland biopsy. Results: In the 40 Sjogren's patients, US enhancement values were significantly lower (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.00003, respectively) than in the 20 non-Sjogren's patients both at rest and during stimulation. In the 23 subjects with the primary syndrome, values during stimulation were significantly lower than in the 17 subjects with the secondary syndrome (P < 0.0006), whereas at rest differences were not significant. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced US imaging allowed to discriminate Sjogren's from non-Sjogren's sicca patients with 87.5% sensitivity, 85% specificity and 86.7% accuracy and the primary from the secondary syndrome with 78.2% sensitivity, 70.5% specificity and 75% accuracy. Interestingly, in eight patients with the primary syndrome, i.e. those with the more severe gland involvement, enhancement values were lower during stimulation than at rest. Preliminary results indicate that contrast-enhanced US imaging can provide useful information on sicca characterisation and severity
- …
