1,720,965 research outputs found

    Current opinions in sialolithiasis diagnosis and treatment

    Full text link
    The introduction, 15 years ago, of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of salivary gland calculi, has changed the therapeutic approach in these patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lithotripsy in sialolithiasis, after 10 years follow-up. A review has been made of the literature to establish current opinions in diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis. The role of ultrasonography, radiography and, in particular, of sialomagnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of salivary lithiasis has been evaluated. The greater efficiency of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment for parotid, compared to submandibular calculi, has been demonstrated (57% versus 33%). In 68% of our patients, lithotripsy was resolutive after 10 years. Ultrasonograpy should be considered first choice examination in diagnosis of salivary calculi. Sialo-magnetic resonance imaging is a recent, non-invasive diagnostic procedure with the advantage of no radiation exposure, and with better definition of anatomical and functional state of glandular parenchyma and duct, compared to other available techniques

    Donor site outcome after oral mucosa harvest for urethroplasty in children and adults

    No full text
    PURPOSE: We report short and long-term donor site outcomes after oral mucosa graft harvesting for urological reconstruction in a large series of patients including children, and identify possible risk factors for an untoward long-term outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 patients were evaluated. Short-term outcomes included time to restore normal oral diet, perioral sensory defect/discomfort and jaw opening impairment occurring within 4 weeks of surgery. Long-term outcomes included donor site scarring, perioral sensory defect and jaw opening impairment occurring more than 1 year postoperatively. Long-term outcomes were assessed via a questionnaire administered to patients and on clinical examination by an oral surgeon. Outcomes were compared in children (younger than 12 years at surgery) and adults, and with regard to harvesting site, graft length, length of followup and other variables. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the patients returned to a normal oral diet within 3 days postoperatively (range 1 to 8). All patients complained of perioral sensory defect/discomfort postoperatively, and 26% had jaw opening impairment. After a median followup of 7.6 years (range 1 to 13.2) perioral sensory defect was the most common complication observed (28%) in cases formally evaluated by an oral surgeon. The sensory defect was seldom perceived by the patients and never required treatment. It was statistically more common in patients undergoing surgery as adults, whereas none of the other variables proved significant. CONCLUSIONS: Oral mucosa graft harvesting is safe irrespective of age. About a quarter of patients, more commonly adults, will have a long-term perioral sensory defect. However, the defect is never perceived as bothersome
    corecore