1,721,326 research outputs found

    Regenerative medicine and liver injury: what role for bone marrow derived stem cells? Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2007 Jan;2(1):83-8. Review. PMID: 18220893 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

    No full text
    In recent years, great interest has been aroused by the discovery of the ability of adult stem cells to contribute to regeneration processes and repair of damaged tissues. In particular, bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs), the most well known population of multipotent stem cells in adults, have been shown to be able to generate many different committed cellular types. In this review, we systematically organize the numerous hypotheses emerging from the most recent studies, in animal and humans, which evaluated the potentiality of BMSCs to contribute to tissue repair in different types of liver damage. Our aim is to give scientists and clinicians who are interested in regenerative medicine the rational basis for planning future studies on stem cell therapy for liver diseases

    NS5A inhibitors for the treatment of hepatitis C infection

    No full text
    Today, we are witnessing a new era for the treatment of hepatitis C with excellent rates of virologic response and very good safety profiles. Among the many classes of direct-acting antivirals, the inhibitors of nonstructural protein 5A are particularly interesting. NS5A is a phosphorylated protein with a relevant role in viral replication. HCV-NS5A inhibitors show high potency, very good safety profile and high barrier to resistance. The amazing in vitro effectiveness of this class is associated with great efficacy in clinical trials in combination protocols with antivirals of other classes, with sustained virological response (SVR) obtained in more than 90% of patients. Herein, we sought to review the current knowledge regarding the NS5A protease complex inhibitors with special emphasis on clinical efficacy and development of viral resistance

    Safety and efficacy of once daily ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination in patients with chronic hepatitis C

    No full text
    Introduction: During the past couple of years, the regulatory authorities have approved seven new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In 2014, the US FDA approved the fixed dose combination of ledipasvir (LDV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) for the treatment of genotype (GT) 1 HCV and the European Commission Granted its marketing authorization to treat patients with GT1 and 4. This regimen showed outstanding rates of virologic response along with a favorable safety profile with a very low rate of both virologic failure and treatment discontinuation.Areas covered: In this review, we sought to review the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety profile pertaining to LDV/SOF combination in treatment of CHC with special emphasis on phase III clinical trials.Expert opinion: In all phase III trials, the 12-week course of this new interferon (IFN)-sparing regimen has delivered high virologic cure rates among patient with GT1 and 4 both treatment-naïve and - experienced Data about its effectiveness in patients under 18 years of age, end-stage renal disease and patients with significant other organ involvement are eagerly awaited

    Managing HCV treatment failure and the potential of resistance testing in informing second-line therapy options

    No full text
    Introduction: Direct acting antivirals have completely changed the landscape of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The management of the few patients who relapse to direct acting antivirals requires a careful analysis of the chances to achieve therapeutic success with a second antiviral course. In this context, the usefulness of viral resistances testing, able to detect resistance-associated substitutions in the viral sequence, is at present a matter of debate. Areas covered: The role of resistance associated substitutions is examined through the evaluation of the data from clinical trials that have assessed the impact of viral resistances on the treatment outcome. Special attention has been paid on the data from re-treatment studies. Expert commentary: The treatment failure in chronic hepatitis C is still a possible event. Therefore, additional real-world clinical data on relapse rates and on the relapse management are welcome to definitely address the clinical guidelines. At present, the testing of viral resistances is an exquisite tool for the choice of the re-treatment schedule. In the near future, widespread use of the most recently registered direct acting antivirals with high barrier to resistance will probably weaken the need of resistance testing as a support in clinical decisions

    Efficacy and Safety of Daclatasvir in Hepatitis C: An Overview

    Full text link
    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a growing public health concern, with 184 million people infected worldwide. During the past decade, interferon has been the backbone of HCV treatment, even though it remains far from ideal. The latest development of the new direct antivirals has drastically changed the treatment approach for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Inhibitors of the HCV NS5A region have garnered remarkable interest among treating physicians, due to their high potency and favourable safety profile. In particular, treatment with daclatasvir (DCV) has yielded high rates of vriologic response in patients infected with genotype (Gt) 1 and Gt 3, when used in combination with other antivirals of a different class, such as sofosbuvir. Although few data are available for DCV treatment of the other Gts, the results in patients with Gt 2 and Gt 4 infection appear promising, as do those for unique patient populations. NS5A-resistant viral variants can pre-exist or emerge after treatment failure for the HCV NS5A inhibitors. Nonetheless, DCV-resistant viral variants continue to be sensitive to interferon and other classes of antivirals such as NS3/4A and NS5B inhibitors. Herein, we aimed to provide an overview of the current knowledge about DCV in the treatment of CHC

    Grazoprevir/elbasvir fixed-dose combination for hepatitis C

    No full text
    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an increasing public health concern with an estimated 184 million people infected worldwide and approximately 350,000 deaths yearly from HCV-related complications. There is a compelling medical need for new anti-HCV therapeutic agents that are potent, tolerable, safe, completely oral and with shorter treatment duration. To this end, a plethora of direct-acting antivirals have been developed and regulatory authorities have approved nine new molecules for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In January 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the fixed-dose combination medication incorporating the NS3/NS4A inhibitor grazoprevir (formerly MK-5172) and the NS5A inhibitor elbasvir (formerly MK-8742), with or without ribavirin, for the treatment of CHC genotypes 1 and 4 infection in adult patients. This all-oral combination has proven potent and safe even in patients with advanced kidney disease. Herein, we review the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety profile pertaining to grazoprevir/elbasvir fixed-dose combination for CHC

    ABT-450: A novel agent for the treatment of CHC genotype 1: Focus on treatment-experienced patients

    Full text link
    Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) constitutes a major health concern. Hepatitis C virus eradication by antiviral treatment can markedly reduce the risk of developing cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death. A plethora of new direct antiviral agents have been developed and are being explored in clinical trials. One of the newest members of this family is the NS3/4A protease inhibitor ABT-450. The multi-targeted approach combining ritonavir-enhanced ABT-450 with ombitasvir and dasabuvir has been evaluated for the treatment of CHC Gt1 in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced adults. In this article, we sought to discuss the current knowledge on ABT-450-containing regimens, with special emphasis on treatment-experienced CHC Gt1 patients. This new combination was found to be potent, safe and well tolerated. Future Phase III trials with larger sample size in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, non-Gt1, end-stage renal disease and liver transplant recipients are eagerly awaited

    Prospective, observational real-life study on eligibility for and outcomes of antiviral treatment with peginterferon α plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C

    No full text
    Background: We aimed to investigate eligibility, reasons for treatment discontinuation and characteristics of chronic hepatitis C patients with treatment failure to peginterferon/ribavirin in clinical practice. Methods: 1128 chronic hepatitis C patients, from 45 Italian Hepatology centres, were enrolled in this phase-4, prospective, observational study from January 2009 to February 2010. Results: 687/1118 patients (61.4%) were eligible for antiviral treatment, of which 598 (87.0%) agreed with the physician's decision. Outcome information was available in 500/598 patients, among whom 348 (69.6%) completed treatment. Treatment was discontinued in 152 patients due to: lack of response (28.9%), personal reasons (29.6%), adverse events (38.2%), and decompensation (1.3%). Sustained virological response was obtained in 263/500 (52.6%), 71 (14.2%) relapsed and 61 (12.2%) were non-responders. Treatment outcome was not available in 105 (21%): lost while receiving treatment (33.3%), lost during follow-up (25.7%), withdrawn for adverse events (19.1%) or for administrative reasons (21.9%). Conclusion: In clinical practice, only 61% of chronic hepatitis C patients are considered eligible for peginterferon/ribavirin. Of these, 13% refuse treatment. Approximately 30% do not complete the scheduled treatment and, despite this, the sustained virological response rate is similar to that of randomized-controlled trials. In the era of new antiviral combinations, these findings have important implications for assessing eligibility and estimating drop-out rates

    De novo autoimmune hepatitis in liver transplant: State-of-the-art review

    Full text link
    In the two past decades, a number of communications, case-control studies, and retrospective reports have appeared in the literature with concerns about the development of a complex set of clinical, laboratory and histological characteristics of a liver graft dysfunction that is compatible with autoimmune hepatitis. The de novo prefix was added to distinguish this entity from a pre-transplant primary autoimmune hepatitis, but the globally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis have been adopted in the diagnostic algorithm. Indeed, de novo autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by the typical liver necroinflammation that is rich in plasma cells, the presence of interface hepatitis and the consequent laboratory findings of elevations in liver enzymes, increases in serum gamma globulin and the appearance of nonorgan specific auto-antibodies. Still, the overall features of de novo autoimmune hepatitis appear not to be attributable to a univocal patho-physiological pathway because they can develop in the patients who have undergone liver transplantation due to different etiologies. Specifically, in subjects with hepatitis C virus recurrence, an interferon-containing antiviral treatment has been indicated as a potential inception of immune system derangement. Herein, we attempt to review the currently available knowledge about de novo liver autoimmunity and its clinical management
    corecore