1,721,029 research outputs found
La c.d. prescadenza dei Consigli regionali tra differenziazioni ed assimilazioni con l'istituto della prorogatio (sent. Corte cost. n. 181/2014)
The Mechanisms Used to Review Existing Legislation in the Civil Law Systems. Case Study - Italy
The aim of this article is to describe the mechanisms that are used in the civil law
system to review existing legislation. The case study will be based on the Italian
system. In the civil law system we are not familiar with the concept of law reform,
in the sense used in the common law system, because there is no law reform agency
in the civil law world. The mechanisms used to review the existing law in civil law
systems are: codification, consolidation, repeal, law revision and legal restatement.
To understand how the mechanisms used to review existing legislation work in
Italy, an overview of the Italian law-making and drafting processes will be carried
out here, underlying the bad impact that the Italian equal bicameralism has on the
quality of legislation and also on the mechanisms to review existing legislation.
After this, the article will focus on the specific tools that are used in Italy for codifi‐
cation and consolidation (decreti legislativi), for law revision (the so-called taglialeggi) and for legal restatement (examining the role of the Consiglio di Stato). Par‐
ticular attention will also be paid to the parliamentary scrutiny on the quality of
legislation. Finally, the article will focus on the constitutional amendment process
Italy carried out in 2014-2016 and that was expected to fundamentally change the
Italian law-making process, superseding the equal bicameralism arrangement (a
referendum on this was held on 4 December 2016, and the reform was rejected by
the Italian people)
La perdurante insindacabilità del procedimento legislativo e la sua impermeabilità alle istanze esterne: i pareri dei Consigli regionali ex art. 132, comma 2, Cost. "sentiti" ma non... ascoltati
La rimozione del Presidente della Giunta regionale e lo scioglimento del Consiglio regionale per una fattispecie di «gravi violazioni di legge» tipizzata nel d.lgs. n. 149/11. Profili problematici ex art. 126, primo comma, Cost.
Le implicazioni della giurisprudenza della Cassazione sull'autodichia delle Camere: dal "giusto processo" al "giusto procedimento parlamentare"
- …
