628 research outputs found
Bracon kotenkoi Samartsev 2018, sp. nov.
Bracon kotenkoi sp. nov. (Figs 20–34) Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, Primorsky kray, Spassk District, Santakheza (= Novoselskoye), rice field, sweeping, 29.VIII.1971, Pineker (ZISP). Paratypes: same locality and collector: 1 ♀, 8.VII.1971 (ZISP); 1 ♀, 23.VII.1971 (ZISP); Primorsky kray, Spassk District, 20 km SW Spassk, Khanka Lake shore, meadow, 1 ♀, 25.VII.1998, S.A. Belokobylskij (ZISP). Etymology. The specific name is given in honor of A.G. Kotenko, a well-known taxonomist of the braconid subfamily Microgastrinae. Description. Female. Body length 3.9–4.6 mm; fore wing length 3.7–3.9 mm. Head. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.60–1.65× its median length. Head rounded behind eyes (dorsal view). Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.50–1.75× longer than temple. Eyes with sparse short setae. OOL 3.1– 3.4× Od; POL 1.25–1.45× Od; OOL 2.20–2.75× POL. Frons with deep medio-longitudinal groove. Longitudinal diameter of eye in lateral view 1.25–1.35× larger than its transverse diameter. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.3–1.7× longer than minimum width of temple; hind margins of eye and temple diverging ventrally. Face width 1.55–1.70× combined height with face and clypeus, 2.1–2.4× larger than width of hypoclypeal depression. Longitudinal diameter of eye 1.60–1.75× longer than malar space (front view); malar space as long as base of mandible. Malar suture absent. Width of hypoclypeal depression 1.0–1.2× larger than distance from depression to eye. Clypeus flattened, with strongly protrudent ventral rim, height of clypeus 0.35× width of hypoclypeal depression. Antenna with 31–33 antennomeres, 0.85–0.95× as long as fore wing. First flagellomere 1.75–2.00× longer than its apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Middle flagellomeres 1.5–1.6× longer than their width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.7–1.8× longer than wide. Mesosoma 1.7–1.8× longer than its maximum height. Transverse oblique pronotal sulcus deep and crenulate. Mesoscutum as wide as its median length (dorsal view). Notauli anteriorly very deep and crenulate, weakly impressed in posterior half. Median lobe of mesoscutum glabrous. Scutellar sulcus crenulate, about 0.2× as long as scutellum. Mesepimeral sulcus weakly crenulate. Middle area of metanotum (dorsal view) with incomplete mediolongitudinal carina. Propodeum anteriorly with simple carina inside short impression and with short branching keel posteriorly. Metapleural sulcus weakly crenulate. Wings. Fore wing 0.85–0.95× as long as body, 3.1–3.2× longer than its maximum width. Pterostigma 3.1–4.0× longer than broad. Vein r arising somewhat behind its middle. Vein 1-R1 1.5–1.6× longer than pterostigma. Marginal cell 5–7× longer than distance from its apex to apex of wing. Vein 3-SR 3.35–3.55× longer than vein r, 0.60–0.65× as long as vein SR1, 1.35–1.55× longer than vein 2-SR. Vein 1-M 0.6–0.7× as long as vein 1-SR+M, 1.5–1.7× longer than vein m-cu and 1.3–1.6× longer than vein cu-a. Vein 2-SR+M 0.25–0.30× as long as vein 2- SR, 0.45–0.55× as long as vein m-cu. Vein 1-CU1 (posterior margin of discal cell) 2.0–2.4× longer than vein cu-a. Vein cu-a more or less interstitial. Vein 2-1A of hind wing absent; vein r-m antefurcal. Legs. Hind femur 3.0–3.3× longer than wide. Hind tibia 1.55–1.60× longer than hind femur, its inner spur 0.5× as long as hind basitarsus. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Fifth segment (without pretarsus) of hind tarsus 0.53– 0.60× as long as hind basitarsus and somewhat longer than second segment. Basal lobes of claws small, not protruding, with a row of short spines basally. Metasoma 1.4–1.6× longer than mesosoma. Median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 0.77–0.85× as large as its apical width. Median area of first tergite separated by areolate-rugose furrow, 0.55–0.65× as wide as apical width of tergite. Dorsolateral arcuate carinae weakly distinct, crossing median area in middle of tergite, weakly curved toward apex. Second tergite without mediobasal area and sublateral impressions, medially 0.95–1.10× as long as third tergite and 0.75–0.80× as large as apical width of first tergite. Basal width of second tergite 1.65–1.75× median length. Suture between second and third tergites deep, almost straight and crenulated. Apical margins of third to sixth tergites thin, without transverse subapical grooves. Ovipositor sheath 0.35–0.40× as long as fore wing. Apex of ovipositor with dorsal nodus and ventral serration. Sculpture. Body mainly smooth. Face and frons weakly granulate. Mesoscutum weakly rugulose posteriorly. Propodeum completely rugose to areolate-rugose. Median area of first metasomal tergite weakly rugulose to areolate-rugose. Second metasomal tergite granulate-rugose, third to sixth tergites with weak fingerprint-like sculpture. Colour. Body mainly reddish-yellow. Antenna and ocellar triangle reddish-brown to dark brown. Head, mesosoma and metasoma yellowish-brown dorsally. Frons, three patches on mesoscutum, propodeum, first metasomal tergite, and median patch on second tergite brown. Wing membrane faintly darkened, pterostigma yellow, veins brownish-yellow. Male unknown. Comparative diagnosis. Relationships of Bracon kotenkoi sp. nov. are listed in the diagnosis of B. santachezae sp. nov. (see below).Published as part of Samartsev, Konstantin G., 2018, New species of the subfamily Braconinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Russian Far East, pp. 238-254 in Zootaxa 4388 (2) on pages 243-244, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/118733
Uncobracon belokobylskii Samartsev 2018, sp. nov.
<i>Uncobracon belokobylskii</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs 65–77)</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype: female, Russia, Primorsky kray, 10 km SE Partizansk, Novitskoe, forest, glades, 3– 4.VIII.2013, S.A. Belokobylskij (ZISP).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific name is given in honor of S.A. Belokobylskij, a leading taxonomist of the family Braconidae and a noted collector.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Female. Body length 2.9 mm; fore wing length 3.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Width of head (dorsal view) 2.0× its median length. Head rounded behind eyes (dorsal view). Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.8× longer than temple. Eyes with dense short setae. OOL 2.3× Od; POL 1.0× Od; OOL 2.3× POL. Frons with very weak medio-longitudinal impression. Longitudinal diameter of eye in lateral view 1.5× larger than its transverse diameter. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 2.0× longer than minimum width of temple; hind margins of eye and temple weakly broadened dorsally. Face width 1.8× combined height with face and clypeus, 2.1× larger than width of hypoclypeal depression. Longitudinal diameter of eye 2.7× longer than malar space (front view); malar space 0.85× as long as base of mandible. Malar suture deep. Width of hypoclypeal depression 1.4× larger than distance from depression to eye. Clypeus prominent, with strongly protruding ventral rim, height of clypeus 0.3× width of hypoclypeal depression.</p> <p>Antenna. First flagellomere 1.7× longer than its apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Middle flagellomeres 1.5× longer than their width.</p> <p>Mesosoma 1.3× longer than its maximum height. Transverse oblique pronotal sulcus deep and carinate. Mesoscutum 1.2× as wide as its median length (dorsal view). Notauli deep anteriorly, weakly impressed posteriorly, united just before scutellar sulcus. Median lobe of mesoscutum glabrous. Scutellar sulcus crenulate, 0.2× as long as scutellum. Mesepimeral sulcus weakly crenulate. Middle area of metanotum (dorsal view) medially elevated, with incomplete longitudinal carina. Propodeum with short branching median carina posteriorly. Metapleural sulcus crenulate.</p> <p>Wings. Fore wing as long as body, 2.5× longer than its maximum width. Pterostigma 2.5× longer than broad. Vein r arising just before its middle. Vein 1-R1 1.6× longer than pterostigma. Marginal cell 7.3× longer than distance from its apex to apex of wing. Vein 3-SR 2.9× longer than vein r, 0.55× as long as vein SR1, 1.3× longer than vein 2-SR. Vein 1-M 0.8× as long as vein 1-SR+M, 1.8× longer than vein m-cu and 2.0× longer than vein cua. Vein 2-SR+M 0.2× as long as vein 2-SR, 0.4× as long as vein m-cu. Vein 1-CU1 (posterior margin of discal cell) 2.3× longer than vein cu-a. Vein cu-a almost interstitial. Vein 2-1A of hind wing absent; vein r-m weakly antefurcal.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 3.5× longer than wide. Hind tibia 1.35× longer than hind femur, its inner spur 0.4× as long as hind basitarsus. Hind tarsus 0.9× as long as hind tibia. Fifth segment (without pretarsus) of hind tarsus 0.5× as long as hind basitarsus and as long as second segment. Claws strongly curved, with large, protruding and blunt basal lobes.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.16× as long as mesosoma. Median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 0.8× as large as its apical width. Median area of first tergite separated by crenulate furrow, 0.6× as wide as apical width of tergite. Dorsolateral arcuate carinae incomplete, strongly curved toward apex. Second tergite without mediobasal area, with deep parallel crenulated sublateral impressions, 0.9× as long as third tergite medially. Basal width of second tergite 2.1× median length. Suture between second and third tergites deep, weakly sinuate and crenulated. Apical margins of third to sixth tergites smooth, without transverse subapical grooves. Ovipositor sheath 0.4× as long as fore wing. Apex of ovipositor with dorsal nodus and ventral serration.</p> <p>Sculpture. Body mainly smooth. Propodeum medially with tree-like rugosity in posterior half. Median area of the first metasomal tergite longitudinally rugose in aterior half. Second metasomal tergite longitudinally rugose with weak granulosity, third to sixth tergites weakly coriaceous.</p> <p>Colour. Body mainly black. Palpi, tegulae and most part of legs brownish-yellow. Hind tibia basally pale yellow, its apical half and hind tarsus dark brown. Wing membrane weakly darkened, pterostigma and veins brown. Male unknown.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Russia: Primorsky kray.</p> <p> <b>Comparative diagnosis.</b> <i>Uncobracon belokobylskii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is distinctly separated from other members of the genus, which differ among each other mainly by their coloration pattern. The key to the species of the genus <i>Uncobracon</i> is given below.</p> <p> 1 Second metasomal tergite longitudinally rugose, without areolate or foveate sculpture (Fig. 77). Hind tibia pale yellow in basal half (Fig. 65). Face width 1.8× combined height with face and clypeus (Fig. 68). Metapleural sulcus crenulate (Fig. 73).............................................................................. <i>Uncobracon belokobylskii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></p> <p>- Second metasomal tergite with coarse areolate-rugose or foveate sculpture (Figs 81, 84, 87, 88). Hind tibia evenly black (Figs 78, 85), sometimes with small reddish-brown patch basally (Fig. 82). Face width 1.2–1.6× combined height with face and clypeus (79, 83, 86). Metapleural sulcus smooth............................................................. 2</p> <p> 2 Hind femur rusty (Fig. 78). Both mesosoma and metasoma mainly reddish-yellow (only propodeum sometimes with brownish patch). Face width 1.2–1.3× combined height with face and clypeus (Fig. 79)................. <i>Uncobracon pappi</i> (Tobias)</p> <p>- Hind femur black (Figs 82, 85). Mesosoma and/or metasoma mainly black. Face width 1.35–1.55× combined height with face and clypeus (Figs 83, 86)............................................................................... 3</p> <p> 3 Mesosoma black, metasoma reddish-brown with brown pattern (Fig. 82). Face width 1.35–1.45× combined height with face and clypeus (Fig. 83)......................................................... <i>Uncobracon apoderi</i> (Watanabe)</p> <p> - Prothorax and mesothorax rusty, metathorax, propodeum and metasoma completely black (Fig. 85). Face width 1.55× combined height with face and clypeus (Fig. 86)...................................... <i>Uncobracon tricoloratus</i> (Tobias)</p>Published as part of <i>Samartsev, Konstantin G., 2018, New species of the subfamily Braconinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Russian Far East, pp. 238-254 in Zootaxa 4388 (2)</i> on pages 249-254, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1187334">http://zenodo.org/record/1187334</a>
Bracon santachezae Samartsev 2018, sp. nov.
Bracon santachezae sp. nov. (Figs 35–48) Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, Primorsky kray, Spassk District, Santakheza (= Novoselskoye), rice field, sweeping, 23.VII.1971, Pineker (ZISP). Paratypes: 1 ♂ with the same label as the holotype (ZISP); Primorsky kray, Chernigovka District, 10 km SE Chernigovka, glades, shrubs, 1 ♀, 27.VII.1996, S.A. Belokobylskij (ZISP); Primorsky kray, Khasan District, Lake Khasan, meadows, shrubs, oakery, 1 ♀, 12– 14.VIII.1998, S.A. Belokobylskij (ZISP). Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the former name of the type locality, the settlement Santakheza (now Novoselskoye). Description. Female. Body length 3.4–3.6 mm; fore wing length 3. 0–3.2 mm. Head. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.5–1.6× its median length. Head rounded behind eyes (dorsal view). Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.55–1.90× longer than temple. Eyes with sparse short setae. OOL 3.0– 3.3× Od; POL 1.55–1.60× Od; OOL 1.9–2.1× POL. Frons with weak medio-longitudinal groove. Longitudinal diameter of eye in lateral view 1.45–1.55× larger than its transverse diameter. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.3–1.5× longer than minimum width of temple; hind margins of eye and temple diverging ventrally. Face width 1.45–1.75× combined height with face and clypeus, 2.3–3.0× larger than width of hypoclypeal depression. Longitudinal diameter of eye 2.2–2.6× longer than malar space (front view); malar space 0.75–0.90× as long as base of mandible. Malar suture absent. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.9–1.2× as large as distance from depression to eye. Clypeus flattened, with protrudent ventral rim, height of clypeus 0.3–0.4× width of hypoclypeal depression. Antenna with 38 antennomeres, 1.3× as long as fore wing. First flagellomere 2.3–2.7× longer than its apical width, 1.00–1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Middle flagellomeres 1.7–2.1× longer than their width. Penultimate flagellomere 2.2× longer than wide. Apical flagellomere acutely pointed. Mesosoma 1.8–2.1× longer than its maximum height. Transverse oblique pronotal sulcus deep and crenulate. Mesoscutum as wide as its median length (dorsal view). Notauli deep anteriorly, smoothened posteriorly, united just before scutellar sulcus. Median lobe of mesoscutum glabrous. Scutellar sulcus crenulate, 0.15–0.17× as long as scutellum. Mesepimeral sulcus weakly crenulate. Middle area of metanotum (dorsal view) with incomplete longitudinal carina. Propodeum with areolate-rugose mid-longitudinal impression and short median carina in anterior third. Metapleural sulcus crenulate. Wings. Fore wing 0.85–0.95× as long as body, 2.9–3.2× longer than its maximum width. Pterostigma 3.1–3.9× longer than broad. Vein r arising just before its middle. Vein 1-R1 1.45–1.65× longer than pterostigma. Marginal cell 6–11× longer than distance from its apex to apex of wing. Vein 3-SR 2.8–3.4× longer than vein r, 0.5–0.7× as long as vein SR1, 1.3–1.7× longer than vein 2-SR. Vein 1-M 0.7–0.9× as long as vein 1-SR+M, 1.5–2.0× longer than vein m-cu and 1.9–2.2× longer than vein cu-a. Vein 2-SR+M 0.1–0.2× as long as vein 2-SR, 0.2–0.5× as long as vein m-cu. Vein 1-CU1 (posterior margin of discal cell) 2.5–2.6× longer than vein cu-a. Vein cu-a interstitial or weakly postfurcal. Legs. Hind femur 2.8–3.1× longer than wide. Hind tibia 1.55–1.60× longer than hind femur, its inner spur 0.48–0.50× as long as hind basitarsus. Hind tarsus 0.95–1.05× as long as hind tibia. Fifth segment (without pretarsus) of hind tarsus 0.6–0.7× as long as hind basitarsus and 1.05–1.20× as long as second segment. Basal lobes of claws large, rounded but not protruding, with a row of short spines basally. Metasoma 1.2–1.3× as long as mesosoma. Median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 0.8– 1.0× as large as its apical width. Median area of first tergite separated by areolate furrow, 0.63–0.65× as wide as apical width of tergite. Dorsolateral arcuate carina complete, crossing median area in middle of tergite, weakly curved toward apex. Second tergite without mediobasal area, with weak parallel sublateral impressions, 1.2–1.4× longer than third tergite medially. Basal width of second tergite 1.25–1.35× median length. Suture between second and third tergites deep, medially almost straight crenulated. Apical margins of third to sixth tergites smooth, but without transverse subapical grooves. Ovipositor sheath 0.30–0.35× as long as fore wing. Apex of ovipositor with dorsal nodus and ventral serration. Sculpture. Body mainly smooth. Face and frons very weakly granulate. Propodeum rugose (except for anterolateral areas). First metasomal tergite rugose. Second metasomal tergite rugose with longitudinal rugosity, third to sixth tergites with weak fingerprint-like sculpture. Colour. Body mainly reddish-yellow. Antenna dark brown. Head dorsally, mesoscutum, mesopleuron, metapleuron and vague patch on metasoma reddish-brown. Axilla, propodeum, first metasomal tergite and median patch on second tergite brownish-black. Wing membrane faintly darkened, pterostigma yellow with brownish base and apex, veins brownish-yellow. Male. Body length 2.3 mm; fore wing length 2.3 mm. OOL 2.2× Od; OOL 1.4× POL. Face width 1.3× combined height with face and clypeus. Longitudinal diameter of eye 3.2× longer than malar space (front view). Wings. Pterostigma 2.5× longer than broad. Vein 3-SR 3.0× longer than vein r. Vein 1-M 1.9× longer than vein mcu. Hind femur 3.6× longer than wide. Median length of first tergite as large as its apical width. Second tergite 1.15× longer than third tergite medially. Basal width of second tergite 1.1× median length. Propodeum mainly smooth. Otherwise similar to female. Distribution. Russia: Primorsky kray. Comparative diagnosis. Together with Bracon kotenkoi sp. nov., B. santachezae sp. nov. belongs to a species group of the section Orthobracon Fahringer sensu Tobias that is separated by basal lobes on claws not angularly protruding, elongate body and more or less completely sculptured metasoma. The differences between the Palaearctic members of this species group are listed in the key below. 1 Second metasomal tergite 1.2–1.4× longer than third tergite medially (Fig. 44). Basal width of second tergite 1.25–1.35× its median length.................................................................. Bracon santachezae sp. nov. - Second metasomal tergite 0.90–1.15× longer than third tergite medially (Figs 29, 51, 54, 59). Basal width of second tergite 1.5–1.9× its median length.............................................................................. 2 2 Longitudinal diameter of eye 1.60–1.75× longer than malar space (front view; Fig. 23)........... Bracon kotenkoi sp. nov. - Longitudinal diameter of eye 2.1–2.9× longer than malar space (front view; Figs 52, 55, 61).......................... 3 3 Ovipositor sheath 1.25–1.60× longer than hind tibia, 0.38–0.55× as long as fore wing (Figs 49, 57). Vein 1-M 0.9–1.0× as long as vein 1-SR+M.—Frons granulate....................................................................... 4 - Ovipositor sheath 0.8–1.1× as long as hind tibia, 0.24–0.31× as long as fore wing. Vein 1-M 0.55–0.80× as long as vein 1- SR+M (Fig. 64)....................................................................................... 6 4 Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.8–2.5× longer than minimum width of temple (Fig. 53); hind margins of eye and temple distinctly diverging ventrally....................................................... Bracon fulvipes Nees - Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.2–1.3× longer than minimum width of temple (Fig. 56); hind margins of eye and temple almost parallel.................................................................................. 5 5 Wing membrane brownish darkened. Vein 2-SR+M about 0.1× as long as vein 3-SR. Pterostigma 4.5× longer than broad................................................................................... Bracon zonulatus Fahringer - Wing membrane weakly darkened. Vein 2-SR+M about 0.3× as long as vein 3-SR. Pterostigma about 3× longer than broad.................................................................................... Bracon andriescui Papp 6 Middle flagellomeres 1.8–2.0× longer than their width. Vein 1-M 6.0–7.6× vein 1-SR. Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.65–1.85× longer than temple (Fig. 62). Wings weakly darkened (Fig. 64)................ Bracon ovoides Telenga - Middle flagellomeres 1.3–1.6× longer than their width. Vein 1-M 3.7–4.7× vein 1-SR. Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.25–1.55× longer than temple. Wings distinctly brownish darkened............... Bracon subcylindricus Wesmael Remark. The key is based on examination of the type material of all listed species. Bracon subcylindricus is considered here to be a valid species despite the recent synonymisation with B. longicollis Wesmael (Papp, 2012). Two latter species clearly differ by the shape of tarsal claws.Published as part of Samartsev, Konstantin G., 2018, New species of the subfamily Braconinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Russian Far East, pp. 238-254 in Zootaxa 4388 (2) on pages 245-249, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/118733
Bracon kasparyani Samartsev 2018, sp. nov.
<i>Bracon kasparyani</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs 2–12)</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype: female, 1♀, Russia, Primorsky kray, 10 km SE Partizansk, Novitskoye, forest, glades, 3– 4.VIII.2013, S.A. Belokobylskij (ZISP). Paratypes: 27 ♀, 2 ♂: Russia: Amur Oblast, S.A. Belokobylskij: Khingan Nature Reserve, forest, forest edges, glades, 1 ♀ (RMNH), 2 ♀, 17–20.VII.2003; env. Arkhara, oakery, meadow, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 25.VII.2003; Primorsky kray: Chernigovka District, 10 km SE Chernigovka, forest, 3 ♀ (ZISP), 20– 21.V.1979, S.A. Belokobylskij; Dalnegorsk Urban Okrug, 25 km N Rudnaya Pristan, oakery, 1 ♀ (RMNH), 2 ♀ (ZISP), 7.VIII.1979, S.A. Belokobylskij; env. Vladivostok, Okeanskaya, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 11.VIII.1963, I.M. Kerzhner; Khasan District, S.A. Belokobylskij: 10 km N Posyet, forest, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 29–30.V.1979; 10 km ENE Posyet, Gvozdevo, forest, glades, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 6, 9.VIII.2013; Golubiny Utes, forest, 1 ♂ (ZISP), 27.V.1979; 25 km SSW Slavyanka, Gorshkov Bay, oakery, forest edges, shrubs, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 16–18.VIII.2001; Lazovsky District, 18 km SE Lazo, Lazovsky Nature Reserve, cordon America, forest edges, clearings, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 24–29.VIII.2006, S.A. Belokobylskij; Nadezhdinsky District, env. Tavrichanka, shrubs, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 26.VIII.1978, S.A. Belokobylskij; Nakhodka Urban Okrug, 20 km SW Nakhodka, Dushkino, forest, glades, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 1 ♀ (ZISP), 1.VIII.2013, S.A. Belokobylskij and A.S. Lelej; Partizansk District, S.A. Belokobylskij: 15 km NW Partizansk, forest, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 13.7.1979; 10 km SE Partizansk, Novitskoye, forest, glades, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 22.7.1984; oakery, 3 ♀ (ZISP), 3 – 4.8.2013; Pogranichny District: Barabash-Levada, oakery, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 2.9.1979, S.A. Belokobylskij; Spassk District, S.A. Belokobylskij: env. Spassk-Dalny, forest, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 2.9.1979; 30 km N Spassk-Dalny, forest, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 4.9.1979; Spassk-Dalny: shrubs, forest, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 13.9.1987; forest, glades, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 1.7.2013; Ussurisky Nature Reserve, 1 ♂ (ZISP), 12.7.1973, A.S. Lelej; Ussuriysk Urban Okrug, env. Ussuriysk: Gorno-Tayozhnoye: 1 ♀ (ZISP), 1 ♀ (ZISP), 1 and 2.8.1963, I.M. Kerzhner; forest, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 31.8.1978, S.A. Belokobylskij; Sakhalin Island, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Novo-Aleksandrovsk, forest, 2 ♀ (ZISP), 26.7.1978, S.A. Belokobylskij; Kuril Islands, Kunashir Island, Sernovodsk, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 26.8.1973, D.R. Kasparyan; Japan, Hokkaido, 35–40 km S Sapporo, Shikotsu Lake, 1 ♀ (ZISP), 4.9.1999, S.A. Belokobylskij.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific name is given in honor of D.R. Kasparyan, an eminent researcher of Ichneumonidae, who made a great contribution to the study and collection of the hymenopteran fauna of the Russian Far East.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Female. Body length 2.3–3.3 mm; fore wing length 2.5–3.6 mm.</p> <p>Head. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.75–1.95× its median length. Head rounded behind eyes (dorsal view). Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.5–1.8× longer than temple. Eyes with sparse short setae. OOL 2.15– 2.55× Od; POL 1.30–1.65× Od; OOL 1.55–1.80× POL. Frons with moderately impressed medio-longitudinal groove. Longitudinal diameter of eye in lateral view 1.55–1.65× larger than its transverse diameter. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.6–2.3× longer than minimum width of temple; hind margins of eye and temple weakly diverging ventrally. Face width 1.5–1.6× combined height with face and clypeus, 2.1–2.3× larger than width of hypoclypeal depression. Longitudinal diameter of eye 2.9–3.4× longer than malar space (front view); malar space 0.75–0.90× as long as base of mandible. Malar suture weakly impressed. Width of hypoclypeal depression 1.2–1.4× larger than distance from depression to eye. Clypeus flattened, with very weak ventral rim, height of clypeus 0.30–0.35× width of hypoclypeal depression.</p> <p>Antenna with 24–28 antennomeres, 0.8–0.9× as long as fore wing. First flagellomere 1.5–2.0× longer than its apical width, 0.9–1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Middle flagellomeres 1.3–1.6× longer than their width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.5–1.7× longer than wide.</p> <p>Mesosoma 1.4–1.5× longer than its maximum height. Transverse oblique pronotal sulcus deep and crenulate anteriorly, smoothened posteriorly. Mesoscutum 1.2–1.4× wider than its median length (dorsal view). Notauli impressed anteriorly, smoothened posteriorly, not united. Median lobe of mesoscutum glabrous. Scutellar sulcus crenulate, 0.08–0.13× as long as scutellum. Mesepimeral sulcus smooth. Middle area of metanotum (dorsal view) with incomplete longitudinal carina. Metapleural sulcus smooth. Mid-longitudinal keel on propodeum absent or very short.</p> <p>Wings. Fore wing 1.05–1.20× longer than body, 2.5–2.7× longer than its maximum width. Pterostigma 2.7–3.2× longer than broad. Vein r arising from its middle. Vein 1-R1 1.3–1.5× longer than pterostigma. Marginal cell 5.1–7.7× longer than distance from its apex to apex of wing. Vein 3-SR 1.75–2.30× longer than vein r, 0.58– 0.67× as long as vein SR1, 1.2–1.4× longer than vein 2-SR. Vein 1-M 0.75–0.85× as long as vein 1-SR+M, 1.8– 2.2× longer than vein m-cu and 2.2–3.3× longer than vein cu-a. Vein 2-SR+M 0.2–0.3× as long as vein 2-SR, 0.3– 0.6× as long as vein m-cu. Vein 1-CU1 (posterior margin of discal cell) 2.5–3.5× longer than vein cu-a. Vein cu-a interstitial or weakly postfurcal. Vein 2-1A of hind wing (almost) absent; vein r-m antefurcal.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 3.25–3.85× longer than wide. Hind tibia 1.4–1.6× longer than hind femur, its inner spur 0.37–0.47× as long as hind basitarsus. Hind tarsus 0.85–0.90× as long as hind tibia. Fifth segment (without pretarsus) of hind tarsus 0.5–0.6× as long as hind basitarsus and 0.95–1.05× as long as second segment. Basal lobes of claws large, angularly pointed.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.00–1.15× as long as mesosoma. Median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 0.75–1.05× as large as its apical width. Median area of first tergite separated by deep crenulate furrow and lacks dorsolateral arcuate carinae, 0.60–0.75× as wide as apical width of tergite. Second tergite without distinct mediobasal area and sublateral impressions, medially 0.8–1.0× as long as third tergite and 0.8–0.9× (sometimes 0.6–0.7 times) as large as apical width of first tergite. Basal width of second tergite 2.0–2.6× median length. Suture between second and third tergites deep, sinuate and smooth. Apical margins of third to sixth tergites thick, without transverse subapical grooves. Ovipositor sheath 0.18–0.20× as long as fore wing. Apex of ovipositor with dorsal nodus and ventral serration.</p> <p>Sculpture. Body mainly smooth. Frons and face weakly granulate. First tergite antero-laterally weakly rugulose or smooth.</p> <p>Colour. Body mainly black. Head with sharp reddish-yellow spots along eye margins. Apical parts of femora and basal parts of tibiae rusty brown (hind legs lighter-coloured; hind tibia basally yellowish). Tegulae dark-brown to black. Wing membrane brownish darkened, pterostigma and veins yellowish-brown. Lateral margins of second to fifth metasomal tergites and ventral side of metasoma reddish-yellow.</p> <p>Male. Body length 2.2–3.2 mm; fore wing length 2.4–2.9 mm. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.9–2.0× its median length. Longitudinal diameter of eye 3.3–3.8× longer than malar space (front view). Width of hypoclypeal depression 1.1–1.3× larger than distance from depression to eye. Penultimate flagellomere 1.9× longer than wide. Median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 1.15–1.25× as large as its apical width. Second tergite medially 1.1× longer than third tergite and 0.95–1.10× as large as apical width of first tergite. Hind tibia rusty brown with brown apex. Otherwise similar to female.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Russia: Amur Oblast, Primorsky kray, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands; Japan, Hokkaido Island.</p> <p> <b>Comparative diagnosis.</b> <i>Bracon kasparyani</i> is related to three species attributed to the subgenus <i>Foveobracon</i> Tobias (Papp 1998). These closely related species, <i>B. belokobylskiji</i> Papp, <i>B. pinguis</i> Papp and <i>B. plugarui</i> Tobias, are considered here together as an aggregate of species, because their taxonomic status cannot be resolved on the basis of currently available material and require a special revision. Because it has the malar suture impressed, <i>B. kasparyani</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> should be compared also with <i>B. gilvus</i> Papp and <i>B. trilateris</i> Papp. The differences between these species are listed in the key below.</p> <p>1 Vein 3-SR 0.4–0.5× as long as vein SR1 (Fig. 13). First flagellomere 2.7–3.6× longer than its apical width (Fig. 15).—Malar suture more or less distinct.............................................................................. 2</p> <p>- Vein 3-SR 0.6–0.7× as long as vein SR1 (Figs 2, 14). First flagellomere 1.5–2.0× longer than its apical width (Figs 2, 19)... 3</p> <p> 2 Metasoma completely sculptured, first to third metasomal tergites striate-rugulose, third to sixth tergites fingerprint-like punctuate. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view; Fig. 15) 2.6× longer than temple. Mesosoma 1.2× longer than its maximum height. Propodeum with complete high mid-longitudinal keel. Vein 3-SR 2.2× longer than vein r. Length of first tergite measured from spiracles 0.6× as large as its apical width (Fig. 15). Basal width of second tergite 2.5× its median length. Ovipositor sheath 0.33× as long as fore wing, 1.3× as long as hind tibia. Body length 2.1 mm................... <i>Bracon gilvus</i> Papp</p> <p> - Metasomal sculpture smoothened (Fig. 52 in Papp 1998), second metasomal tergite weakly rugulose, third and fourth tergites with very weak fingerprint-like sculpture. Transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.4–1.7× longer than temple. Mesosoma 1.6–1.7× longer than its maximum height. Propodeum with short mid-longitudinal keel posteriorly. Vein 3-SR 1.6–1.7× longer than vein r. Length of first tergite measured from spiracles 0.75–0.85× as large as its apical width (as on Fig. 17). Basal width of second tergite 1.6–1.8× its median length. Ovipositor sheath 0.24× as long as fore wing, 0.8× as long as hind tibia. Body length 1.6–2.2 mm.................................................................... <i>Bracon trilateris</i> Papp</p> <p> 3 Malar suture distinct (Fig. 3). Second metasomal tergite and second metasomal suture smooth (Fig. 12). Middle flagellomeres 1.30–1.60× longer than their width (Fig. 2). Ovipositor sheath 0.18–0.20× as long as fore wing, 0.62–0.72× as long as hind tibia.—Third to fifth tergites always without transverse subapical furrows. Body length 2.3–3.3 mm.................................................................................................... <i>Bracon kasparyani</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></p> <p> - Malar suture absent. Second metasomal tergite at least medially sculptured; second metasomal suture crenulate (Fig. 18). Middle flagellomeres 1.75–1.90× longer than their width (Fig. 19). Ovipositor sheath 0.22–0.24× as long as fore wing, 0.75–0.90× as long as hind tibia. Body length 2.3–3.0 mm....................................... <i>Bracon</i> (superspecies <i>plugarui</i>)</p>Published as part of <i>Samartsev, Konstantin G., 2018, New species of the subfamily Braconinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Russian Far East, pp. 238-254 in Zootaxa 4388 (2)</i> on pages 239-242, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1187334">http://zenodo.org/record/1187334</a>
Bracon (Osculobracon) pelliger subsp. rumezensis Samartsev & Zargar 2020, ssp. n.
Bracon (Osculobracon) pelliger rumezensis Samartsev & Zargar ssp. n. (Figs 2 D–F, 3A–E) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BDC57BC4-156B-4797-9689-171CF616983B Type material. Holotype: ♀ (ZISP), Iran, Khuzestan, Ramhormoz, Gharabad, (30°59′37.73″N, 49°46′50.63″E, 126 m), 4–18.v.2016, Malaise trap in olive orchards, leg. M. Zargar. Description (female) Body length 2.2 mm, fore wing length 2.4 mm. Head. Width of head (dorsal view) 2.0× as long as its median length; transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 2.0× longer than temple; eyes with sparse, short setae; OOL 2.2× OD; POL 1.4× OD; OOL 1.6× POL; frons without medio-longitudinal groove; longitudinal diameter of eye in lateral view 1.4× larger than its transverse diameter; transverse diameter of eye (lateral view) 1.9× longer than minimum width of temple; hind margins of eye and temple hardly broadened downwards; face width 1.5× longer than combined height of face and clypeus, 2.7× larger than width of hypoclypeal depression; longitudinal diameter of eye 3.1× longer than malar space (front view); malar space 0.83× shorter than base of mandible; malar suture deep and smooth; width of hypoclypeal depression as large as distance from depression to eye; clypeus flattened, without protruding ventral rim, height of clypeus 0.45× as long as width of hypoclypeal depression; maxillary palp as long as eye height; antenna as long as fore wing, with 24 antennomeres; first flagellomere 3.4× longer than its apical width, 1.2× longer than second flagellomere; penultimate flagellomere 2.4× longer than wide. Mesosoma. 1.4× longer than its maximum height; transverse pronotal sulcus smooth, medially shallow; mesoscutum 1.2× wider than its median length (dorsal view); notauli deep anteriorly, smoothened posteriorly; scutellar sulcus smooth, 0.05× as long as scutellum; mesepimeral and metapleural sulci smooth; mesopleural pit weak, furrow-like. Wings. Fore wing 2.6× longer than its maximum width, 1.1× longer than body; pterostigma 2.8× as long as wide; vein r arising from basal 0.4 of pterostigma; vein 1-R1 0.77× as long as pterostigma; marginal cell 0.85× as long as distance from its apex to apex of wing; vein 3-SR 1.9× longer than vein r, 0.46× as long as vein SR1, 0.98× as long as vein 2-SR; vein 1-M 0.88× as long as vein 1-SR+M, 1.8× as long as vein m-cu; vein 2-SR+M 0.16× as long as vein 2-SR, 0.28× as long as vein m-cu; vein 1-SR+M almost straight; vein 1-CU1 (posterior margin of discal cell) 2.9× longer than vein cu-a; vein cu-a interstitial. Legs. Hind femur 4.3× longer than width; hind tibia 1.5× longer than hind femur, its inner spur 0.28× as long as hind basitarsus; hind tarsus as long as hind tibia; fifth segment (without pretarsus) of hind tarsus 0.38× as long as hind basitarsus, 0.65× as long as second segment; basal lobes of claws with small angular lobes. Metasoma. 1.3× longer than mesosoma; median length of first tergite (measured from petiolar tubercle) 1.7× larger than its apical width; median area of first tergite separated by smooth furrow, 0.79× as wide as apical width; second tergite medially 0.50× as long as third tergite, 0.86× as large as apical width of first tergite; anterolateral margin of second tergite largely desclerotized; suture between second and third tergites deep but thin, weakly curved and smooth; apical margins of third to sixth tergites largely desclerotized; ovipositor sheath 0.23× as long as fore wing; apex of ovipositor with weak nodus and notch and with ventral serration. Sculpture and colour. Body completely smooth and mainly yellow. Antenna, patches on clypeus and gena, propleuron, metanotum, median parts of propodeum and metasomal tergites, middle tarsus distally and apex of hind tibia and most of hind tarsus brownish. Malar space, face near toruli, maxillary palps and desclerotized parts of metasoma pale yellow. Pterostigma pale brownish-yellow with yellowish-brown patch apically; wing with yellowish-brown veins and weakly darkened membrane. Male. Unknown. Etymology. The name refers to the type locality Ramhormoz situated in the Khuzestan province. The place is popular amongst the natives by the name “Rumez”. Differential diagnosis. Bracon (O.) pelliger rumezensis ssp. n. differs from the nominative subspecies by the characters listed in the key below (by their relevance). 1. Longitudinal diameter of eye 3.1× longer than malar space (front view; Fig. 3C). Width of head (dorsal view) 4.2× larger than apical width of first metasomal tergite (Fig. 3B). Hind femur 4.3× longer than wide. Transverse diameter of eye 2.0× longer than temple (dorsal view; Fig. 3B). Frons without medio-longitudinal groove. Fifth segment of hind tarsus (without pretarsus) 0.38× as long as hind basitarsus. Body length 2.2 mm....................................................... Bracon pelliger rumezensis ssp. n. –. Longitudinal diameter of eye 2.4–2.6× longer than malar space (front view; Fig. 1D). Width of head (dorsal view) 3.0–3.3× larger than apical width of first metasomal tergite. Hind femur 3.4–3.6× longer than wide. Transverse diameter of eye 1.65–1.75× longer than temple (dorsal view; Fig. 1B). Frons with more or less deep medio-longitudinal groove; fifth segment of hind tarsus (without pretarsus) about 0.46× as long as hind basitarsus. Body length 2.3–2.7 mm........................... Bracon pelliger pelliger Tobias, 1961Published as part of Zargar, Mohammad, Samartsev, Konstantin, Talebi, Ali Asghar & Farahani, Samira, 2020, Study of the genus Bracon Fabricius, 1804 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Iran new subspecies, new records and an updated checklist, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 4758 (2) on pages 203-206, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4758.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/373435
New species of Euphorinae parasitoids of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from South Korea
Ku, Deok-Seo, Samartsev, Konstantin G., Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2020): New species of Euphorinae parasitoids of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from South Korea. Zootaxa 4742 (2): 256-270, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.2.
Centistes (Centistes) ahni Ku & Samartsev & Belokobylskij 2020, sp. nov.
Centistes (Centistes) ahni sp. nov. Figs 1, 2 Type material. Holotype: female, South Korea, Gyeongbuk, Sungju, Suryun, Baekun, Mt. Gaya, light trap, 1– 2.VII.2000 (T.- H. An leg.) (NIBR). Description. Female. Body length 6.5 mm; fore wing length 6.1 mm. Head width 1.75 × its median length, 1.1 × width of mesoscutum (without tegulae). Temple behind eyes (dorsal view) uniformly and almost linearly narrowed; transverse diameter of eye 2.0 × length of temple. Ocelli large, arranged in triangle with base 1.4 × its sides; POL 0.8 × Od, 2.3 × OOL. Eye bare, 1.4 × as high as broad. Malar space height 0.15 × eye height, 0.6 × basal width of mandible. Face width 0.6 × eye height, equal to height of face. Clypeus almost flat, its width 2.0 × maximum height, 0.8 × width of face. Distance between tentorial pits 2.7 × distance from pit to eye. Malar suture distinct. Hypostomal flanges short and pointed. Mandible large and distinctly twisted, its length 0.7 × transverse diameter of eye. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly-roundly narrowed. Antenna weakly thickened, weakly setiform, 31-segmented. First flagellar segment almost 3.0 × longer than its apical width, 1.2 × longer than second segment. Penultimate segment 2.0 × longer than width, 0.4 × as long as first segment and 0.55 × as long as apical segment, which is acuminated apically. Mesosoma. Length 1.4 × its height. Mesoscutum mainly densely and shortly setose, but glabrous at rather narrow sublateral elongated areas. Notauli almost indistinct, in form of very shallow traces. Mesoscutum without medioposterior depression. Prescutellar depression deep, with low median carina, finely rugulose-striate, about 0.5 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum convex. Sternauli absent. Wing. Fore wing 3.0 × longer than wide. Radial (marginal) cell weakly shortened, metacarpus (1-R1) (within radial cell) 1.3 × longer than pterostigma, 6.7 × longer than distance from apex of radial (marginal) cell to apex of wing. Radial vein (r) arising weakly behind middle of pterostigma. First radial abscissa (r) 0.65 × as long as width of pterostigma, 0.1 × as long as second abscissa (3-SR +SR1), which is weakly and almost evenly curved. First radiomedial vein (2-SR) 4.3 × longer than first radial abscissa (r), 1.5 × longer than recurrent vein (m-cu). Recurrent vein (m-cu) distinctly postfurcal. Discoidal (discal)cell shortly petiolate anteriorly. Distance from nervulus (cu-a) to basal vein (1-M) 0.8 × nervulus (cu-a) length. Hind wing 3.6 × longer than maximum width. Second abscissa of mediocubital vein (1-M) 0.3 × as long as first abscissa (M+CU), 0.6 × as long as basal vein (1r-m). Legs. All femora thickened. Fore femur 3.1 × longer than wide. Hind femur 3.3 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.9 × as long as hind tibia; its second segment 0.6 × as long as first segment, 0.8 × as long as enlarged fifth segment (without pretarsus). Claws long and thick. Metasoma. First tergite almost not widened towards apex, weakly convex laterally, with small but distinct spiracular tubercles in basal third. Apical width of first tergite 1.1 × its minimum subbasal width, 0.9 × its width at level of spiracles; its length 1.95 × its apical width. Combined length of second and third tergites about 3.0 × basal width of second tergite. Second suture absent. Hypopygium simple and mainly glabrous. Ovipositor sheath rather short, narrow, almost flat, subparallel at most part, but weakly widened subapically, then strongly linearly narrowed and acuminate apically, with sparse in basal half and dense in apical half long and erect setae; length of setae 1.0–1.5 × maximum width of sheath. Length of sheath 5.4 × its maximum width, 0.7 × length of first tergite. Sculpture. Head mainly smooth to very finely punctate, face finely punctate with oblique striation mediolaterally. Mesoscutum and mesopleuron smooth. Sides of pronotum mainly smooth, only medioanteriorly with a few coarse rugae. Propodeum with delineated basomedial oval area, with oblique transverse lateral carinae and median longitudinal carina in posterior half; most part of propodeum densely and rather finely rugulose-striate. First metasomal tergite densely and finely longitudinally striate and partly with reticulation, almost smooth submedially. Remaining tergites smooth. Colour. Body mainly dark reddish brown to black, prothorax and anterior lower half of metasoma brownish yellow. Antenna dark reddish brown, somewhat paler basally. Palpi pale yellow. Legs yellowish-brown. Wings faintly infuscate. Pterostigma dark brown. Male. Unknown. Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. (C.) dmitrii Belokobylskij, 1996 known from the Kunashir Island of Russia and South Korea, but differs in having different shape of ovipositor sheath (long and mainly parallel-sided), dark brown head, different areolation of propodeum, narrow and practically not widened apically first metasomal tergite, and wide hind femur. Etymology. This species is named in honour of late Dr Sung-Bok Ahn, South Korean entomologist.Published as part of Ku, Deok-Seo, Samartsev, Konstantin G. & Belokobylskij, Sergey A., 2020, New species of Euphorinae parasitoids of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from South Korea, pp. 256-270 in Zootaxa 4742 (2) on pages 257-258, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/367778
FIGURE 8. Dirrhope rufa Foerster A in Discovery of the braconid subfamily Dirrhopinae van Achterberg (Hymenoptera Ichneumonoidea) from the Indian subcontinent with the description of a new species from south India
FIGURE 8. Dirrhope rufa Foerster A) Head, ventral view, B) Wings.Published as part of Ranjith, A.P., Samartsev, K.G. & Nasser, M., 2021, Discovery of the braconid subfamily Dirrhopinae van Achterberg (Hymenoptera Ichneumonoidea) from the Indian subcontinent with the description of a new species from south India, pp. 251-262 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/443839
Leiophron (Leiophron) pubiscutum Ku & Samartsev & Belokobylskij 2020, sp. nov.
Leiophron (Leiophron) pubiscutum sp. nov. Figs 3, 4 Type material. Holotype: female, “ Korea, Gyeongnam, Chinju, Chojeon-dong (at Mercury lamp), 7–8.VII.1995, Deok-seo Ku ” [NIBR]. Paratypes. 4 females, 2 males, National Institute of Forest Science, Hongneung, Seoul, light trap, 11.VIII.1998 (S.-H. Kang leg.) (SMNE, ZISP); 3 males, same locality, light trap, VII.1998 (S.-H. Kang leg.) (SMNE, ZISP); 1 female, Korea, Gyeongnam, Chinju-shi, Kajwadong, 14.VII.1993 (D.-S. Ku leg.) (SMNE); 1 male, same label, but 18.V.1993 (SMNE); 1 female, 1 male, Korea, Gyeongnam, Chinju, Chojeon-dong, at Mercury lamp, 31.VII– 1.VIII.1995 (D.-S. Ku leg.) (SMNE, ZISP); 1 male, same label, but 30–31.VII.1995 (SMNE). Description. Female. Body length 1.2–1.4 mm; fore wing length 1.0– 1.1 mm. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.3 × its median length, 1.4 × width of mesoscutum. Temples behind eyes (dorsal view) weakly convex in anterior half and roundly narrowed in posterior half; transverse diameter of eye 1.4–1.5 × length of temple. Frons weakly convex, without median carina, furrow or pit. Ocelli arranged in triangle with base 1.5 × its lateral sides; POL 2.5–3.0 × Od, 0.8–1.1 × OOL. Eye with rather distinct and dense pale setae, 1.3 × as high as broad. Malar suture distinct. Malar space 0.7–0.8 × basal width of mandible, 0.25–0.30 × height of eye. Face weakly convex, width of face 1.0–1.1 × its median height, 0.55–0.60 × height of eye. Distance between tentorial pits 4.0–4.5 × distance from pit to eye. Width of clypeus 2.4–2.7 × its median height, 1.3–1.4 × width of face; clypeus with short prominent ventral margin. Head distinctly and weakly-roundly narrowed below eyes (front view). Occipital carina dorsally incomplete, widely interrupted, rarely with fine track; fused with hypostomal carina below. Antenna thickened, weakly claviform, 13-segmented, about 0.5 × as long as body. Scape 1.7–1.9 × longer than wide. First flagellar segment 2.5 × longer than its apical width, 1.1–1.2 × longer than second segment, which is 1.5–1.6 × longer than its maximum width. Length of penultimate segment 1.00–1.15 × its width, 0.6 × length of apical segment; last segment obtuse apically or weakly acuminate and without spine. Mesosoma. Length 1.5–1.6 × its maximum height. Mesoscutum 0.85–0.95 × as long as maximum width. Notauli distinct only anteriorly on vertical part of mesoscutum, completely absent on its horizontal part. Prescutellar depression long, with high median carina, finely rugulose, 0.4 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum convex, without transverse depression posteriorly. Subalar depression distinct, rather wide, almost smooth. Sternaulus deep anteriorly and shallow posteriorly, rather narrow, sinuate, rugulose-crenulate, with shallow furrow from posterior part of sternaulus to hind coxa. Mesopleuron with shallow smooth oblique furrow from mesopleural pit to sternaulus or without it. Wings. Length of fore wing 2.7–3.0 × its width. Length of pterostigma 2.1–2.3 × its maximum width. Radial (marginal) cell strongly shortened, narrow or sometimes very narrow, 2.5–3.5 × longer than wide. Metacarpus (1-R1) 0.2–0.3 × as long as pterostigma, 0.45–0.65 × as long as width of pterostigma. Radial vein (r) with single evenly curved abscissa (r), which is often strongly desclerotised in distal half, arising distinctly behind middle of pterostigma and separately from first radiomedial vein (2-SR). First radiomedial vein (2-SR) strongly desclerotised, more or less distinct only near pterostigma. Recurrent vein (m-cu) strongly desclerotised, indistinct or almost indistinct. Discoidal (discal) cell petiolate anteriorly, 1.5–1.8 × longer than wide. Nervulus (cu-a) weakly postfurcal. Basal vein (1-M) weakly thickened. Second abscissa of longitudinal anal vein (2-1A) sclerotized basally at rather long distance. Medial (basal) cell sparsely setose, glabrous in basal third. In hind wing, nervellus (cu-a) absent; medial (basal) cell narrow. Legs. Hind femur elongate-oval, 3.2–3.5 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus about as long as hind tibia, its second segment 0.50–0.55 × as long as first segment, 0.8–0.9 × as long as fifth segment (without pretarsus). Fifth segment of fore and of middle legs weakly thickened. Claws simple. Metasoma 1.0–1.2 × as long as mesosoma. First tergite distinctly and more or less evenly widened towards apex, without spiracular tubercles, with distinct dorsope. Apical width of first tergite 1.8 × its minimum width, its length 1.3–1.4 × apical width, weakly longer than propodeum. Length of second and third tergites combined 1.7–2.0 × basal width of second tergite, 1.00–1.25 × their maximum width. Sculpture and pubescence. Head mainly smooth, face very densely and finely punctate. Mesoscutum finely and densely punctulate. Scutellum and mesopleuron smooth. Propodeum finely reticulate-rugulose, partly almost smooth, with several and usually irregular areas deliniated by distinct carinae. Hind coxa mainly smooth. First metasomal tergite longitudinally striate, with fine reticulation between striae. Mesoscutum widely in dense, rather long and semi-erect pale setae, almost glabrous on narrow lateral areas. Frons and face in dense white semi-erect to erect setae. Colour. Body mainly brownish-yellow, metasoma brown to dark brown in posterior half laterally and apically. Antenna mainly brown, five basal segments yellow. Palpi yellow. Legs yellow. Wings faintly infuscate. Pterostigma brown, pale yellow to subhyaline in basal third. Male. Propodeum more coarsely rugulose, with carinae sometimes almost hided by surrounding sculpture. Body sometimes darker. Otherwise very similar to female except sexual features. Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to Leiophron (L.) apicalis Haliday, 1833, but differs in having the occipital carina complete dorsally (widely interrupted in P. apicalis), antenna only 13-segmented (always more than 13-segmented in P. apicalis), basal flagellar segment shorter, 2.5 × longer than wide (longer, 3.7–4.0 × longer than wide in P. apicalis), mesoscutum mostly with dense and rather long setae (almost glabrous in P. apicalis), first metasomal tergite wide and more or less linearly striate (narrow and rugose in P. apicalis). Etymology. This species is named from Latin “pubis” (pubescent) and “scutum” (shield) because the mesoscutum is distinctly pubescent.Published as part of Ku, Deok-Seo, Samartsev, Konstantin G. & Belokobylskij, Sergey A., 2020, New species of Euphorinae parasitoids of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from South Korea, pp. 256-270 in Zootaxa 4742 (2) on pages 260-263, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/367778
Perilitus koreanus Ku & Samartsev & Belokobylskij 2020, sp. nov.
Perilitus koreanus sp. nov. Figs 5, 6 Type material. Holotype: female, “ Korea, Gyeongnam Geoje Dongbu Pyongji, 4–5.VI.1997 (LT), Deok-Seo Ku ” (NIBR). Paratypes. 2 females, Korea, Gyeongnam Geoje-gun Nambu-myeon Dapo-ri, LT, 15–16.VII.1994 (S.-J. Hwang leg.) (SMNE); 1 female, same label, but 15–16.VII.1994 (J.-S. Jeon leg.) (SMNE); 2 females, South Korea, 19– 20.VI.2000 (E.-S. Kang leg.) (SMNE, ZISP); 2 females, with label as in holotype (SMNE, ZISP); 1 female, Korea, JeonNam Yeocheon-Gun, Dolsan-eup, Yulrim-ri, Impo (at U. V. lamp), 18–19.VII.1993 (D.-S. Ku leg.) (SMNE). Description. Female. Body length 2.9–3.4 mm; fore wing length 2.5–2.9 mm. Width of head (dorsal view) 1.8–1.9 × its median length, 1.3–1.4 × width of mesoscutum. Occiput weakly concave. Occipital carina complete dorsally, but rather fine. Temples behind eyes (dorsal view) strongly and weaklyroundly narrowed, transverse diameter of eye 2.0–2.1 × length of temple (2.6–2.7 × if measurement on straight line). Ocelli medium-sized, arranged in triangle with base 1.3–1.4 × its lateral sides; posterior margin of median ocellus placed just before level of anterior margins of lateral ocelli. POL 1.3–1.5 × Od, 0.8–1.0 × OOL. Eye with rather sparse and short setae, 1.25–1.30 × as high as broad. Malar suture present. Malar space very short, its height 0.3 × basal width of mandible, 0.07–0.08 × height of eye. Antennal tubercles short. Width of face 0.85–0.90 × its median height, 0.6 × height of eye. Tentorial pits distinct, distance between pits 5.0–5.7 × distance from pit to eye. Clypeus high, weakly convex, with narrow ventral flange. Width of clypeus 1.5–1.7 × its median height, 0.7–0.8 × width of face. Head strongly and almost linearly narrowed below eyes (front view). Antenna filiform, 25–26-segmented, 0.8–0.9 × as long as body. First flagellar segment 3.1–3.5 × longer than its apical width, almost as long as second segment. Length of penultimate segment 1.5–1.8 × its width, 0.4–0.5 × length of first and 0.55–0.60 × length of apical segments. Apical segment acuminate apically, but without spine. Mesosoma. Length 1.55–1.60 × its maximum height. Notauli distinct, not deep, narrow, complete, crenulate. Prescutellar depression long, with five distinct carinae, almost smooth or weakly rugulose between carinae, 0.30– 0.35 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum convex, with distinct transverse and weakly rugulose depression posteriorly. Sternaulus shallow, wide, entirely rugose-reticulate. Propodeum without lateral tubercles, strongly and convexroundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), with its posterior half almost perpendicular to anterior part, with distinct and rather deep wide median longitudinal depression in posterior half (dorsal view). Wings. Length of fore wing 2.6–2.8 × its width. Length of pterostigma 4.2–4.3 × its maximum width. Radial (marginal) cell shortened, acuminate apically, 3.1 × longer than wide. Metacarpus (1-R1) 0.9–1.0 × as long as pterostigma, about 4.0 × longer than width of pterostigma, 2.5–3.5 × distance from apex of radial (marginal) cell to apex of wing. Second abscissa of radial vein (3-SR + SR1) evenly curved in basal one-third and almost straight in apical two-thirds; radial vein (r) arising almost from middle of pterostigma. First radial abscissa (r) about 0.7 × as long as maximum width of pterostigma, about 0.1 × as long as second abscissa (3-SR + SR1), 0.35 × as long as first radiomedial vein (2-SR). First abscissa of medial vein (1-SR+M) present, weakly sinuate or almost straight. Recurrent vein (m-cu) weakly postfurcal or sometimes subinterstitial. Distance from nervulus (cu-a) to basal vein (1-M) 0.5–0.7 × nervulus (cu-a) length. In hind wing, basal vein (1r-m) 1.8 × longer than third abscissa of costal vein (2-SC+R). Legs. Hind femur 5.2–5.6 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.85–0.95 × as long as hind tibia, its second segment 0.45–0.50 × as long as first segment, 1.5–1.6 × longer than fifth segment (without pretarsus). Metasoma. First tergite rather distinctly widened posteriorly, with small spiracular tubercles behind middle, without laterope and dorsope. Apical width of first tergite 2.6–3.0 × its minimum width, length 2.6–2.8 × its apical width, 1.6–1.8 × longer than propodeum (dorsal view). Length of second and third tergites combined 1.6–1.8 × basal width of second tergite. Ovipositor compressed, weakly curved down. Ovipositor sheath narrow, 1.2–1.5 × as long as first tergite, 0.8 × as long as hind tibia, 0.30–0.35 × as long as fore wing. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and temple almost smooth, partly very finely coriaceous; frons entirely densely finely granulate; face densely punctate-granulate. Sides of pronotum mainly rugulose-reticulate, partly smooth below at narrow part. Mesoscutum almost smooth, rugulose-reticulate on rather large medioposterior area. Mesopleuron almost smooth on wide median area. Propodeum entirely rather densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate. Hind coxa mainly smooth, rugulose basally. First metasomal tergite almost entirely densely striate, smooth apically on narrow area. Median lobe of mesoscutum entirely densely setose, lateral lobes glabrous at most part. Colour. Body brownish-yellow, meso- and metasoma dorsally faintly darker. Antenna yellow in basal quarter or half and light reddish-brown to reddish-brown on remaining part. Palpi yellow. Legs yellow. Wings hyaline. Pterostigma pale yellow. Male. Unknown. Comparative diagnosis. The new species is similar to Eastern Palaearctic P. aequorus Chen et van Achterberg, 1997 and differs in having the sternauli widely rugose-reticulate, frons and face densely and finally granulate, and body almost entirely light reddish-brown. Etymology. This species is named in honour of country, Korea, where the new species was found.Published as part of Ku, Deok-Seo, Samartsev, Konstantin G. & Belokobylskij, Sergey A., 2020, New species of Euphorinae parasitoids of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from South Korea, pp. 256-270 in Zootaxa 4742 (2) on pages 263-265, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/367778
- …
